Don’t Quit Your Day Job

  • submit to reddit

This post first appeared on the FAIR website on September 1, 2013.


Right-leaning pundit Mike Murphy defends the NSA while his firm works for NSA contractors.

On an episode of NBC’s Meet the Press (6/23/13), right-leaning pundit Mike Murphy called Edward Snowden a “so-called whistleblower” and defended the NSA’s wide-ranging surveillance programs. “The Internet is an incredibly effective tool for terrorists and outlaws,” he said. “So it’s not surprising that the security side of the state is trying to compete with that.”

What might have been surprising to viewers, as Lee Fang reported for The Nation (6/24/13), is that “Murphy himself has a stake in this debate that arguably ought to have been disclosed.” The lobbying firm he founded, Navigators Global, represents large private contractors that work with the NSA.

And in 2011, Murphy joined Revolution Agency, a PR firm whose clients include major corporations and trade groups. The firm creates advertising campaigns on key political issues from energy policy to consumer protection — opposing the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, for instance.

Murphy, as Revolution’s website proudly notes, writes regular columns for Time magazine and appears on NPR and Meet the Press.

But do readers, viewers or listeners have any idea what Murphy does at his day job?

If they do, it’s not because the outlets feel any obligation to disclose anything about his work. Murphy is usually identified as a “former Republican strategist” — which tells something about his politics, but nothing about the very powerful interests paying his salary.

Murphy isn’t the only one, of course. Plenty of pundits play the role of partisan warriors in cable TV studios. But that’s not their real job — or at least not the one where they likely make their real money.

Stephanie Cutter, CNN pundit 'from the left,' provides 'strategic advice' to Bank of America

Take Stephanie Cutter, one of the two new hosts “from the left” on the relaunched version of CNN’s Crossfire.

Once described as “a one-woman rapid response squad flooding the zones on cable, YouTube and the Sunday news shows” (Politico,7/8/12), Cutter is a heavyweight political strategist with nicknames like “The Ninja” and “Box Cutter” (New York Times, 10/12/12). After stints in the Clinton White House and at the Democratic National Committee, Cutter was on the presidential campaign team for both John Kerry in 2004 and Barack Obama in 2008.

Cutter’s partisan track record makes her a perfect fit for corporate media’s left/right debates. But taking over at Crossfire is just part of her work. This year she formed Precision Strategies, a PR firm with other former Obama White House officials, specializing in communications and “crisis management.”

The obvious question: Who do they work for? Precision, like many companies in this line of work, does not make its client list public. But the Wall Street Journal (5/9/13) reported that Cutter — along with former George W. Bush adviser Ed Gillespie — was “providing strategic advice to Bank of America on several issues, including efforts to break up the banks.”

That left the Huffington Post’s Jason Linkins (5/10/13) to speculate that Cutter “may also soon be repping Bank of America’s point of view on a rebooted Crossfire for CNN.” You can imagine the show’s new introduction: On the left, a professional defender of corporate interests; on the right, Newt Gingrich.

As reported by PR Week (5/2/13), Cutter “said her work at Precision would not preclude her from future TV work.” It’s natural for her to see the two roles as complementary; access to a powerful media platform makes her much more valuable as a PR operative. But media outlets are supposed to have rules that prevent such conflicts of interest.

David Axelrod set the standard for Astroturf. (cc photo: Talk Radio News Service)

Cutter isn’t the only former Obama official to find work as a TV pundit. In fact, many of them can be found on the same channel: the liberal-leaning MSNBC. That’s where former Obama adviser David Axelrod landed after leaving the administration, joining the cable channel as a senior analyst in early 2013 (L.A. Times, 2/19/13). Unlike some other pundits, Axelrod — a former journalist — made his reputation in communications and PR long before he was a pundit, running the AKPD consulting firm before getting into electoral politics.

The firm was considered the “gold standard in Astroturf organizing” (Businessweek, 3/14/08), the manufacture of phony grassroots campaigns on behalf of corporate interests like Comcast and Commonwealth Edison.

Around the same time MSNBC hired Axelrod, the channel announced that former Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs would be making appearances as a contributor.

But that’s not his only job. A few months after joining MSNBC, it was announced that Gibbs was starting the Incite Agency, a strategic communications firm affiliated with New Partners (Washington Post, 6/13/13). While it is too early to get a sense of who Gibbs and his colleagues will be representing, it stands to reason that corporate or political clients will value the fact that he makes regular TV appearances.

Even if you’re not opening your own PR shop, experience in the Obama White House is very profitable. As the Washington Post (5/30/13) reported, “on issues ranging from gun control to mining to legalized gambling,” former Obama staffers like Gibbs find themselves much in demand. Gibbs, the Post noted, was one of several former White House officials who got “five-figure checks” to give speeches in Azerbaijan, a country “in the midst of a campaign to burnish its image in Washington.”

The Post (3/17/13) also noted, “Companies still pay handsomely to hear from a top political operative such as Axelrod,” who had “recently joined the Washington Speakers Bureau.” Who will be paying him, and for what, should be of interest to people who see him on TV — and it should be of concern to NBC and MSNBC.

Hilary Rosen PR work for BP became an issue only when the oil giant spilled 5 million barrels in the Gulf of Mexico.

The problem of pundit disclosures is, of course, not unique to MSNBC. Consider Hilary Rosen, former Recording Industry Association of America CEO and a frequent contributor at CNN. Rosen is, as a 2011 Politico profileexplained, well-connected: “When it comes to attending parties, she can afford to be choosy, overlooking many of the less exclusive events for those you probably weren’t invited to.” Rosen waded into some controversy in 2012 campaign season when she said that Ann Romney, the wife of the GOP presidential candidate, had “never worked a day in her life” (CNN, 4/11/13).

But Rosen’s real job deserves more attention. She is currently the managing director for strategic communications and public relations at SKDKnickerbocker, a firm criticized for using its “perceived White House access” to sign clients (Hot Air, 4/13/12).

Sometimes these connections become a problem. In the midst of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill, Rosen was forced out as the Huffington Post’s Washington editor at large because of her connection to oil giant BP (Politico, 6/4/10). At the time, Rosen managed BP’s public relations at the Brunswick Group, a communications/lobbying firm. The Huffington Post’s decision made perfect sense from an ethical standpoint, but one does have to wonder why such conflicts become impermissible only in times of acute national crisis; at ordinary times, not revealing which corporations are paying you, and for what, is apparently fine.

While many of these profiting pundits play the “left” on TV, there are plenty of conservatives hard at work at the same game. After he supposedly “broke” with George W. Bush and politics, strategist Matthew Dowd told The New York Times (4/1/07) that it was time for a big career change:

I wouldn’t be surprised if I wasn’t walking around in Africa or South America doing something that was like mission work.… I do feel a calling of trying to re-establish a level of gentleness in the world.

That would have been heartwarming. But instead Dowd became a pundit, making appearances on outlets like ABC, where he is a regular contributor. His more lucrative gig is as a partner at Vianovo, a strategic consulting firm that assists major corporations like AT&T and Airbus on “high-stakes brand, policy and crisis issues.”

One of Cutter’s new Crossfire sparring partners, Kevin Madden, is best known for his role as a spokesperson for the Mitt Romney presidential campaigns. He is executive VP of public affairs at JDA Frontline, which works for corporations and trade associations like the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (Politico, 5/14/13).

Lanny Davis, spokesperson for dictatorships.

And then there are the times when the ideological lines get a little blurry, if they weren’t blurry enough already. Former RNC chair Michael Steele and Fox News liberal Lanny Davis are cable news fixtures — and business partners. Steele’s tenure at the RNC was marked by gaffes and scandal (Washington Post, 4/7/10), while Davis’ history has included working on behalf of the dictators of Equatorial Guinea and Ivory Coast (Salon, 12/21/10).

In June 2012, they founded the bipartisan-themed Purple Nation Solutions, a communications firm that specializes in “solutions through legal means, political lobbying and media management” for “CEOs, Fortune 500 companies, political leaders, lobbyists and individuals facing a crisis.”

In fact, it’s difficult to catalog all of the possible conflicts of interest among elite TV pundits. Former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell plays a TV liberal on MSBNC — but he’s also an adviser at investment bank Greenhill & Co, as well as an operating partner at a small firm that makes investments in the energy industry.

Another TV liberal, Harold Ford, who makes frequent appearances on NBC and MSNBC, also has a day job: He works as a senior managing director for the investment giant Morgan Stanley. Columnist Glenn Greenwald (Salon, 7/9/12) called Ford “the walking, breathing embodiment of virtually everything rotted and corrupt about the American political class”—in other words, a ubiquitous TV pundit.

Once upon a time, such conflicts were considered ethically questionable—once they were exposed by other journalists. Back in 2008, Ken Silverstein of Harper’s (6/12/08, 6/21/08) revealed that Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and David Broder were regulars on the corporate lecture circuit; thePost’s ombud Deborah Howell (6/22/08) reported that Broder declared he was “embarrassed by these mistakes.”

The next year, former Newsweek reporter Richard Wolffe appeared as a guest host on Keith Olbermann’s MSNBC show Countdown (7/30/09). But Wolffe wasn’t a reporter any more; as Salon’s Greenwald (8/1/09) reported, he worked as a senior strategist at Public Strategies, a corporate PR firm. Olbermann took the issue seriously, apologizing and declaring that “until we can clarify what else he is doing, he will not be appearing with us” (Huffington Post, 9/3/09). NBC issued a statement saying that they “should have disclosed Richard’s connection to Public Strategies.”

Just a few years later, it is not clear whether cable news outlets still think they need to tell viewers what their leading pundits really do for a living.


Peter HartPeter Hart is the activism director at FAIR. He writes for FAIR’s magazine Extra! and is also a co-host and producer of FAIR’s syndicated radio show CounterSpin. He is the author of The Oh Really? Factor: Unspinning Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly (Seven Stories Press, 2003). Rebecca Hellmich is an aspiring journalist. You can follow her on Twitter @RebeccaHellmich.
  • submit to reddit

BillMoyers.com encourages conversation and debate around issues, events and ideas related to content on Moyers & Company and the BillMoyers.com website.

  • The editorial staff reserves the right to take down comments it deems inappropriate.
  • Profanity, personal attacks, hate speech, off-topic posts, advertisements and spam will not be tolerated.
  • Do not intentionally make false or misleading statements, impersonate someone else, break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity.

If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.

We need your help with this. If you feel a post is not in line with the comment policy, please flag it so that we can take a look. Comments and questions about our policy are welcome. Please send an email to info@moyersmedia.com

Find out more about BillMoyers.com's privacy policy and terms of service.

  • NotARedneck

    There are big profits to make in war and the “war on terror” along with conventional conflicts is no exception. Constantly stirring the pot is the easiest way to transfer what little remains of the wealth of the poor and middle class to the wealthy.

    Syria is likely on the front burner because armaments manufacturers want contracts to resupply the arms depots soon.

    The covert war is more difficult to stoke so it is a matter of constantly doing things that will keep the threat humming. Drone strikes are a godsend to these types since they guarantee that there will be more and more “enemies” every year!

  • Anonymous

    Those disclosures would be a nice start, but reporters who serve on boards of advocacy organizations like Greenwald on The Freedom Of The Press Foundation, which exists to funnel money to WikiLeaks, should be reporting those links when the stories involve those interests.

  • Anonymous

    And this is why I avoid watching political programs any more. I tend to lean left … OK, I lean WAY left … but it looks like the folks I’ve been listening to are just as two-faced as the folks I have always assumed were two-faced!

  • Anonymous

    P.J. O’Roarke wrote a book that’s aptly named to describe these phenomena: “Parliament of Whores.”

  • http://www.ronaldwgumbs.com ronaldwgumbs

    Please don’t insult the whores. Prostitution is an honorable profession, and always was, since the dawn of civilization. We need more whores and less talking heads on TV.

  • JonThomas

    What I’ve been currently appreciating (I use that word loosely,) is the dissonance between, the public commentary that we see flourishing on most media outlet websites, and what the pundits are expressing. Delightfully so, public commentary is becoming more and more sophisticated and insightful.

    Well except for Yahoo and most of the partisan outlets, although Yahoo has surprised me a few times of late.

    Never once do you hear a pundit express…”I was reading on such-and-such website and a reader made the most astute observation…”

    I think that’s what I enjoy about M&C. I understand that to continue working and keeping ahead of the cycles requires time and commitment to what is ‘next.’ Especially so when you are not just reactionary, like most news programs and websites, but blazing a trail of investigative and exposé style journalism. However the team at M&C, even Mr. Moyers himself (as I have seen him reply to comments here on the site,) seems to be reactive to what viewers are responding.

    The commentary and on-going discussion on this site is incredible!

    Other writers whose works are published here also take the time to engage in discussion. This is extraordinary, and much appreciated.

    While such interaction of course needs to be measured (especially since some of us commenting are out-right nutcases…lol,) sadly the pundits who embody the example of this article, are ones who need to maintain an air of being ‘above.’

    They cannot show themselves bowing down, or recognizing the value of other’s opinions. No! They must be the ones getting their ring kissed! Otherwise they face the prospect of destroying the illusion. Destroy the illusion, and put the contrived worth as glorified sales people in danger! They don’t bleed, they don’t look in the eye, they don’t admit to taking note of, well… anyone.

    Yes, the veil of the curtain maintained, and the wizard eats caviar.

    Perhaps someday heels will click together and the illusion will give way to reality.

    .

  • Anonymous

    At least you know a whore’s a whore- whereas these corporate whores pass themselves off as defenders of virtue…

  • Anonymous

    I’m not so sure non-profit affiliation is the moral equivalent of a for-profit motivation. Unlike corporate PR firms, Greenwald doesn’t get a cut of that non-profit money…