Montana’s Political Donation Limits Restored, For Now

  • submit to reddit

The Supreme Court in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Montana has a century-long history of strong campaign finance laws, so in the wake of Citizens United, conservative groups have made the state a front in their campaign to scale back regulations on campaign donations. But opponents of Citizens United won a small victory in Montana this week: The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals placed a hold on a lower court ruling that struck downMontana’s campaign donation limits. The hold will stay in place through election day. Without the hold, the lower court ruling would have opened the doors to unlimited spending in state and local races.

The successful appeal comes after a series of defeats in Montana earlier this year. Courts struck down a law prohibiting attack ad creators from knowingly making false statements as well as a ban on partisan endorsements of judges. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear arguments on a Montana law that prohibited corporate donations to candidates and political parties because they had already decided the issue in Citizens United.

Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer (D) and Lieutenant Governor John Bohlinger (R) in a video response to the Supreme Court's June decision not to hear testimony on a Montana campaign finance law. Click the image to watch their video.

Montana District Court Judge Charles C. Lovell, who issued the lower court ruling put on hold, wrote that “[m]uch has been made of whether striking Montana’s contribution limits is good policy and good for Montana voters. This case, though, is not about policy. It is about following the law that the United States Supreme Court set out.”

Opponents of Citizens United in Montana are seeking to challenge the Supreme Court’s ruling on election day with a state ballot initiative, I-166. The initiative would establish “a state policy that corporations are not entitled to constitutional rights because they are not human beings, and charges Montana elected and appointed officials, state and federal, to implement that policy.”

  • submit to reddit
  • Gail A. Williams

    This Californian is proud of Montana! We need a Constitutional amendment so Ctiizens United is permanently revoked, outlawed and such a ruling is rendered impossible!

  • Strawman411

    Fully agreed, but in this polarized political climate manufactured by big-money interests, I can’t see any amendment to the Constitution ever again achieving the super-majorities required to pass..

    I fear we are left with a corporate-owned congress to somehow defy their masters and pass the necessary legislation, i.e., actually serve instead the interests of the 99%.

    Don’t think I’ll be holding my breath in anticipation..

  • Owen Johnson

    Montanans have always been kind of independent. And I respect that. Hang in there, Montana!

  • Anonymous

    Way to go Montana! If we pull together we can beat Citizens United! We are all in this together (except the 1%)!

  • Steph in Montana

    I am a montana resident and I’ve never seen political advirtising like this cycle has delivered. My children were forced to vote for either Obama, or Romney in the public school recently and there were no third party canadates offered ! This STINKS of election fraud and opinion forming tactics to steal the election away from RON PAUL who Everybody really wants to vote for ! The electronic vote counting machines should be banned and CNN should do the count in public like the congressional hearings are done. This obvious fakery must STOP !!!