ALEC Is Bad for the Economy

  • submit to reddit

This article originally appeared in Mother Jones.

The American Legislative Exchange Council, the corporate-funded group that generates nearly a thousand pro-business model bills per year and feeds them to state legislatures nationwide, is holding its annual policy summit in the nation’s capital this week to meet with new state lawmakers and “prepare the next generation of political leadership.” This coincides with the release of a report showing that ALEC’s economic prescriptions are not good for the economy.

Each year, ALEC ranks the states on how tightly they adhere to the group’s policy recommendations — from personal and corporate tax rates, to public sector employment levels, to right-to-work laws — as a predictor of their economic growth. The study released Wednesday, by the Iowa Policy Project and Good Jobs First, two policy groups that promote economic growth at the state level, introduces those rankings to reality. It concludes: “A hard look at the actual data finds that the ALEC…recommendations not only fail to predict positive results for state economies — the policies they endorse actually forecast worse state outcomes for job creation and paychecks.” (Though the report is careful to maintain that though ALEC policies are correlated with less prosperous state economies, that doesn’t necessarily mean the policies caused economic decline.)

Let’s take a look. In six key measures of economic growth, ALEC’s “Economic Outlook Rankings” fail to coincide with the actual economic outlook of a state over time. On the horizontal axis we have all 50 states’ ALEC economic grades from 2007, when ALEC started its ranking system. The vertical axis shows the percent change in actual economic performance from 2007 until last year. If ALEC’s fortune-telling were correct , the plotted points would form an upward, rightward line, with a better score corresponding with a better economy. But what happens is pretty much the opposite:

Note the downward slope:

Whoa, downward slope:

A better economy means higher incomes, means more tax revenue, right? 

Aaaaand upward slope:

Instead of boosting states’ fortunes, the report finds that ALEC’s preferred policies seem to provide “a recipe for economic inequality, wage suppression, and stagnant incomes, and for depriving state and local governments of the revenue needed to maintain the public infrastructure and education systems that are the true foundations of long term economic growth and shared prosperity.”

Erika Eichelberger is a reporter in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. Follow her on Twitter @eichelberger_e.
  • submit to reddit
  • Anonymous

    As much as I totally support the premise that ALEC is bad for US democracy (and then some), the argument presented here would be much stronger if the same trends were present during the more ‘normal’ (or even boom) time in the years preceding the 2008 bust and related general downturn everywhere. Does it? If so, that would seal the argument.

  • NB

    ALEC has been publishing its index since 2007, so undortunately the first year for which ALEC’s predictions can be compared to observed change is 2008.

  • Rosie12day

    Alec is a non-profit and should not bee. Alec is a group that has very evil undertoning. Alec is a radical non-profit and is very right wing republican. It sure gets what it wishes. This group is underming our democracy.