Politicians’ Extortion Racket?

  • submit to reddit

There are two sides to the story of special interest money in Washington, according to an op-ed today in The New York Times by Peter Schweizer, a fellow at the conservative Hoover Institution. While the traditional narrative is that politicians are corrupted by wealthy interests, Schweizer says we may be getting it wrong.

He says some politicians are involved in a type of “legal extortion” to get their hands on cash, with terms like the “tollbooth” and “milker bills” describing some of these practices. Whatever you call it, it doesn’t sound like the type of democracy we’d ideally like to have. He writes:

Consider this: of the thousands of bills introduced in Congress each year, only roughly 5 percent become law. Why do legislators bother proposing so many bills? What if many of those bills are written not to be passed but to pressure people into forking over cash?

This is exactly what is happening. Politicians have developed a dizzying array of legislative tactics to bring in money.

Take the maneuver known inside the Beltway as the “tollbooth.” Here the speaker of the House or a powerful committee chairperson will create a procedural obstruction or postponement on the eve of an important vote. Campaign contributions are then implicitly solicited. If the tribute offered by those in favor of the bill’s passage is too small (or if the money from opponents is sufficiently high), the bill is delayed and does not proceed down the legislative highway.

House Speaker John A. Boehner appears to be a master of the tollbooth. In 2011, he collected a total of over $200,000 in donations from executives and companies in the days before holding votes on just three bills. He delayed scheduling a vote for months on the widely supported Wireless Tax Fairness Act, and after he finally announced a vote, 37 checks from wireless-industry executives totaling nearly $40,000 rolled in. He also delayed votes on the Access to Capital for Job Creators Act and the Small Company Capital Formation Act, scoring $91,000 from investment banks and private equity firms, $32,450 from bank holding companies and $46,500 from self-described investors — all in the 48 hours between scheduling the vote and the vote’s actually being held on the House floor.

Another tactic that politicians use is something beltway insiders call “milker bills.” These are bills designed to “milk” donations from threatened individuals or businesses. The real trick is to pit two industries against each other and pump both for donations, thereby creating a “double milker” bill.

President Obama and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. seemed to score big in 2011 using the milker tactic in connection with two bills: the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act. By pitting their supporters in Silicon Valley who opposed the bills against their allies in Hollywood who supported the measures, Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden were able to create a sort of fundraising arms race.

Read the full post at The New York Times »

Karin Kamp is a multimedia journalist and producer. Before joining billmoyers.com she helped launch The Story Exchange, a site dedicated to women's entrepreneurship. She previously produced for NOW on PBS and WNYC public radio and worked as a reporter for Swiss Radio International.
  • submit to reddit
  • strider367

    Once upon a time (less than 10 years ago). These extortionist would get indicted. Now all they have to deal with is the ethics committee. That gives them a slap on the hand. Since the ethics is heavily invested in these tactics as well this will just keep happening.

    As long as this payola is allowed. Then we the people will always be we the screwed by special interest…

  • Anonymous

    You’re an optimist. Remember Nixon’s impeachment? He was taking bribes hand over fist. ATT paid for the republican convention, built him a 9 hole golf course on his San Clemente estate, told big agriculture, “Just tell us what you want us to do.”
    Instead of going after Nixon for taking bribes, they went after him for “obstruction of justice” for dirty trick number 4952 Watergate.
    “Accepting bribery, treason, and other high crimes against the state” are grounds for impeachment in the Constitution.
    Nobody wanted to open that can of worms because they were all guilty. Even Obama admitted, “Nobody’s hands are clean.”
    Extortion is why republicans were so against ACA. Just threatening to pass it over the last 40 years, must have brought in billions.
    Extortion is the way they play the game.

  • strider367

    Nixon wasn’t impeached. He resigned before the impeachment proceeding started. He took money to pay off the Watergate burglars. Nobody could ever prove he took money for himself. He was very self conscious about that after the checkers scandal.

    Now fast forward to Clinton when he was elected he had $30k in the bank. As governor he only made $30k a year. But when he left office he was worth over 150 million. Now clearly he took a lot of money. But amazingly it was all legal.

    Until money is taken out of government. Nothing will be done for the working class. Because there’s no money in it for them…

  • Mohammed Abbasi

    sounds like illegal extortion; too bad Congress is the one in charge of investigating itself.