How Michigan’s Right-To-Work Law Came to Be

  • submit to reddit
Protesters gather for a rally at the State Capitol in Lansing, Mich. protesting right-to-work legislation. December 2012. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
Protesters gather for a rally at the State Capitol in Lansing, Mich., Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

As police held back thousands of protesters near the state capital building, Michigan, the birthplace of the modern labor movement, became the 24th state to enact so-called “right-to-work” legislation. Earlier today, Governor Rick Snyder signed two bills preventing public and private sector unions from requiring workers to pay union fees.

The Detroit News reports that after requests from Grover Norquist and others, Snyder switched sides on the issue. United Auto Workers President Robert King said in an interview, that the Koch brothers and Amway owner Dick DeVos “bullied and bought their way to get this legislation in Michigan.”

In an editorial headlined “Drinking the Kochs’ Kool Aid,” the Detroit Free Press was unable to account for the governor’s change of heart, but offered some theories on the motivations of State Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville. He may have been under pressure, the newspaper said, from the anti-union Americans for Prosperity and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), both financially supported by the Koch brothers. ALEC’s model right-to-work bill “mirrors the Michigan law word for word.”

Word is the groups threatened Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville’s leadership post, and promised him a primary challenge in 2014, if he refused to move right-to-work forward.

But none of this explains why the seemingly pragmatic Snyder would hitch his wagon to an organization that has already demonstrated more interest in its own ideological objectives than in Snyder’s priorities. What have the [American Legislative Exchange Council] ALEC’s sponsors done for Michigan, and how did a governor who seemed dedicated to the middle path …end up in bed with them?

(Although it isn’t known how many Michigan state legislators are members of ALEC, the Detroit Free Press reports that at least one of the lawmakers who introduced the bill has been associated with ALEC.)

Some have speculated that the governor’s decision was born out of frustration with the UAW, which earlier this year pushed through a ballot initiative to write collective bargaining rights into the state constitution. The proposition was voted down in November by a margin of 58 to 42 percent. Greg McNeilly, who runs Michigan Freedom Fund, a PAC that supports the right-to-work law, told The Washington Post that the measure’s failure emboldened Republicans.

“Bob King put this on the agenda,” McNeilly said, referencing the UAW president. “He threatened this state. He tried to bully and intimidate the state with this disastrous proposal that was so bad a majority of his members didn’t even back it. The whole state had a conversation. They lost.”

Last week, the governor and the state’s House and Senate majority leaders suddenly moved on the legislation, announcing their plans in a group press conference in which they said the issue is about fairness: workers should have a choice.

In fact, workers already do have a choice. Federal law guarantees that they can’t be forced to join unions, that they can’t be made to pay dues or fees to causes they don’t support. A worker hired today in a Michigan union shop already can refuse membership and pay only a fraction of a union member’s dues to cover the cost of workplace bargaining. The new law — aimed at weakening unions even further — effectively puts organized labor into a position where workers can pay nothing and still receive the benefit of collective bargaining.

As President Obama noted on Monday, “These so-called ‘right-to-work’ laws, they don’t have to do with economics, they have everything to do with politics. What they’re really talking about is giving you the right to work for less money.” Research backs the president up. Last year, the Economic Policy Institute released a report estimating that right-to-work laws decreased hourly wages for all workers by 3 percent. When businesses make a profit, the beneficiaries are typically CEOs and owners, not workers.

  • submit to reddit

BillMoyers.com encourages conversation and debate around issues, events and ideas related to content on Moyers & Company and the BillMoyers.com website.

  • The editorial staff reserves the right to take down comments it deems inappropriate.
  • Profanity, personal attacks, hate speech, off-topic posts, advertisements and spam will not be tolerated.
  • Do not intentionally make false or misleading statements, impersonate someone else, break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity.

If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.

We need your help with this. If you feel a post is not in line with the comment policy, please flag it so that we can take a look. Comments and questions about our policy are welcome. Please send an email to feedback@billmoyers.com

Find out more about BillMoyers.com's privacy policy and terms of service.

  • http://twitter.com/hermit1warbler Wendy Moore

    So AMWAY doesn’t want me to purchace any of their products either. BOYCOTT AMWAY.

  • wordzworth

    …by a margin of 58 to 46 percent… ??? ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/MKarnakz Gina de Miranda

    This is a repulsive display of greed that will boomerang on Michigan. Try reading the Snake Oil report on goodjobsfirst.org

  • http://www.facebook.com/MKarnakz Gina de Miranda

    Here’s what I think. If the workers want to give donations to their union as a sign of good faith….that’s not illegal either.

  • http://www.facebook.com/texsbill Texsbill Gran

    wealth, power, personal success in U.S.A.’s capitalistic society facilitated by “zero-sum” mentality. pursuit of every existing dollar at expense of competition, which is actually all other people. you are what you do; years of myopic goals & greed become large part of what a successful capitalistic person is.

  • mthrfrndsstr

    female w/45+ years of work experience, in private sector, as owner-operator, for big & sm companies/corporations, I never made enough $ to save or had a pension that wasn’t plundered until employed as a clerical union member. Union protection for woman equals ‘speak softly & carry big stick’.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kathleen.ryanberger Kathleen Ryan-Berger

    Spineless lawmakers should be removed…

  • analal

    right on sista

  • Byard Pidgeon

    More Michigan voters cast votes for Republicans than for Democrats or other pro-labor candidates…and now Michigan is surprised?
    How has one of the most intrinsic policies of the Republicans, anti-unionism, escaped the notice of so many voters? The voters made this possible before the corporate lobby.

  • http://twitter.com/AriannaEditrix Arianna

    Having grown up in Arizona, a “right to starve” state for eons, I can tell you that the ALEC snake is still alive, well, and will be more than happy to swallow more jobs and more people. Get the ALEC list, Boycott ALEC! Though you may have to shop locally if you do. ;)

  • JD

    No they didn’t cast more votes for republicans. It is the result of effective gerrymandering and it has happened in many states.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/11/1168952/-The-cost-of-gerrymandering#

  • Byard Pidgeon

    …and the gerrymandering was made possible by voters electing those who did the gerrymandering…it doesn’t happen by itself.

  • JD

    I hear you Byard. I was just pointing out that in this last election more michigan voters didn’t cast more votes for republicans. Of course, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. It’s possible that you are right and in PREVIOUS elections they did just that.

  • Anonymous

    Solution: Support MoveToAmend while also promoting disclosure laws along the way. Neither the founders nor any legislative body said that legal ficticious entities known as corporations (or unions) are protected by the Bill of Rights or the rest of the Constitution and its amendments. It has been solely and entirely the judiciary, and particularly the Supreme Court, over the last 150 years that has systematically, case by case, granted legal ficticious entities constitutional rights.
    All individuals should have the right to assemble to advance their common purposes, but that does not mean they have the right to do so while hiding behind the unique legal protections granted to corporations for the purposes of engaging in commerce. This is particularly confirmed by the fact those assembling under a corporation — the stockholders and employees — are not even asked if they wish the corporation to engage in the political activities in which it engages. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that corporations are actually functioning as an assembly of individuals pursuing a common purpose when the corporation engages in political activities.

  • http://bit.ly/SYj39M << Work from home, $15/h, link

    The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible.