The Lies We Believed (And Still Believe) About Iraq

  • submit to reddit
President George W. Bush speaks to US troops, Nov. 27, 2003, in Baghdad, Iraq. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
US President George W. Bush speaks to US troops at the Baghdad International Airport on Thursday, November 27, 2003, in Baghdad, Iraq. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

The following is an excerpt from Charles Lewis’s book, 935 Lies. Lewis joins Bill this week to talk about why facts, logic and reason are often missing in the rush to war.

At the end of 2004, a series of public opinion polls offered disturbing news. More than half of all Americans, we learned, believed that there had been weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq — the principal raison d’être for George W. Bush’s war of choice there — despite the fact that numerous widely publicized bipartisan and international reports had definitively shown that no such weapons existed. This stubborn refusal to face the facts about Iraq continues today for millions of Americans. [1]

935 Lies book cover

Publisher: PublicAffairs Books, 392 pages

Facts are and must be the coin of the realm in a democracy, for government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” in Abraham Lincoln’s words, requires an informed citizenry. [2] But in regard to the Iraq War, it seems, facts are now irrelevant or at least debatable, a mere matter of opinion, for a majority of Americans. And if facts no longer matter to millions of our fellow citizens, then what becomes of the traditional role of the journalist as the independent watchdog digging through obfuscation, secrecy and deception by the powerful in search of what Carl Bernstein once called “the best obtainable version of the truth”?

This is a question that touches me personally — not just as a concerned citizen, but as someone who has dedicated his life and work to the pursuit of truth. In more than three decades as an investigative reporter in Washington, DC, my approach toward those in power, regardless of party or ideology, has followed the principle “Watch what they do, not what they say.”

Politicians, captains of industry, and their zealous aides too often resemble circus barkers, shilling for attention and advantage, with little regard for accuracy or veracity, using the press and the news media not to enlighten but to bamboozle the public in pursuit of votes, profits and power. When necessary, they even employ the wiles of deception to conceal, disguise, or justify unseemly and sometimes outright criminal behavior. As George Orwell wrote, in words that still ring true more than half a century after they were written, “Political speech and writing are largely the defence [sic] of the indefensible . . . Political language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”[3]

Precisely what had US government officials said to cause most Americans and their elected representatives to completely ignore facts, logic and reason in the rush to war? Exactly who was involved and to what extent?

So as a professional truth-seeker, I have always been skeptical of statements by those in power, preferring to ignore the official versions of events in my quest for the (sometimes ugly) underlying realities. That quest continues. But when I learned the extent to which the public had swallowed and accepted the official lies about WMDs in Iraq, I realized that I actually could no longer ignore what those in power had said. Their shameless manipulations and mis-representations, I now saw, were a crucial element in the tragedy of that dubious war of choice, and therefore deserving of investigation and analysis in their own right. Precisely what had US government officials said to cause most Americans and their elected representatives to completely ignore facts, logic, and reason in the rush to war? Exactly who was involved and to what extent?

I began systematically to investigate the answers to those and other related questions, enlisting the help of a team of reporters, researchers and other contributors that ultimately included 25 people. Nearly three years later, the Center for Public Integrity published Iraq: The War Card, a 380,000-word report with an online searchable database. [4] It was released on the eve of the five-year anniversary of the invasion of Iraq and was covered extensively by the national and international news media.

Our report found that in the two years after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush and seven of his administration’s top officials made at least 935 false statements about the national security threat posed by Iraq. The carefully orchestrated campaign of untruths about Iraq’s alleged threat to US national security from its WMDs or links to al Qaeda (also specious) galvanized public opinion and led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses. Perhaps most revealing: the number of false statements made by top Bush administration officials dramatically increased from August 2002 to the time of the critical October 2002 congressional approval of the war resolution and spiked even higher between January and March 2003, between Secretary of State Colin Powell’s address before the United Nations General Assembly and the fateful March 19, 2003, invasion. [5]

Within hours of the release of our report, White House press secretary Dana Perino responded with scorn: “I hardly think that the study is worth spending any time on. It is so flawed in terms of taking anything into context or including — they only looked at members of the administration rather than looking at members of Congress or people around the world. Because as you’ll remember, we were part of a broad coalition of countries that deposed a dictator based on a collective understanding of the intelligence.” [6] This sophistry was at least consistent with the administration’s track record of distorting reality. In fact, neither Congress nor America’s international allies was demanding an invasion of Iraq before the administration started beating the war drums.

Our report found that in the two years after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush and seven of his administration’s top officials made at least 935 false statements about the national security threat posed by Iraq.

The so-called Coalition of the Willing was a face-saving artifice cobbled together after the UN Security Council failed to approve the US-instigated invasion, rendering it a violation of the UN Charter and thus “illegal.” Furthermore, “the intelligence” referred to by Perino proved to be anything but intelligent; indeed, it had been mostly manufactured by the administration in accordance with its political agenda. [7]

Three months after the Center for Public Integrity Iraq report, David Barstow of The New York Times reported more details about how the Iraq deception had been orchestrated. Barstow revealed that the Pentagon had quietly recruited and coached 75 retired military officers to be “independent” paid consultants and radio and television analysts whose true role was to make the case for war in Iraq. Many had significant, undisclosed financial ties to defense companies and were thus benefiting hugely from the very policies they were “analyzing.” [8]

Earlier, Barstow had reported (with colleague Robin Stein) that “at least 20 federal agencies, including the Defense Department and the Census Bureau, have made and distributed hundreds of television news segments between 2001 and 2005 . . . Many were subsequently broadcast on local stations across the country without any acknowledgement of the government’s role in their production.” David Walker, the then comptroller general of the Government Accountability Office, who happened to be a Republican, declared that such taxpayer-paid propaganda by the government is unethical and violates federal law. However, the Bush administration publicly disagreed, and Congress meekly declined to pursue the matter any further. [9]

The broadcast and cable news media, which had overwhelmingly failed to investigate or challenge the administration’s flawed case for war, shamelessly ignored Barstow’s revelations, neither reporting on their own dubious use of such compromised news sources nor apologizing to the public for the resulting gross misrepresentations of fact.

The full extent of deference to power and self-censorship by our obsequious major news media during the run-up to war is still not fully known; it will gradually seep out — or not — over the coming years.

And a month after the stunning Times stories, one of the White House officials who had actually made several false statements in the lead-up to the Iraq invasion, former press secretary Scott McClellan, wrote a “surprisingly scathing” memoir admitting that his own public comments at White House briefings about Iraq had been “badly misguided,” that President Bush had not been “open and forthright on Iraq,” and that instead he had relied on “propaganda.” [10]

There were a few honorable exceptions in Washington to the general failure of the news media to challenge the pro-war deceptions. They included the fine independent coverage by then Knight Ridder (now McClatchy) Washington bureau reporters Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay; the prescient articles by Walter Pincus, buried in the back pages by his nervous Washington Post editors; and, in early 2004, the Abu Ghraib prison-abuse scandal stories by CBS News 60 Minutes II and Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker. Later, in 2005, beyond the Iraq deceptions, there were Dana Priest’s exposés in The Washington Post about the Central Intelligence Agency’s secret “black site” prisons and James Risen and Eric Lichtblau’s stories in The New York Times revealing how the Bush administration had quietly authorized the National Security Agency (NSA) to secretly eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States, without warrants usually required for domestic surveillance. [11]

Buying the War: How Big Media Failed Us
But in the context of the overall performance of the media, these valiant efforts to get beyond the official version to uncover the truth about our involvement in Iraq were too little, too late. The full extent of deference to power and self-censorship by our obsequious major news media during the run-up to war is still not fully known; it will gradually seep out — or not — over the coming years. Some major news organizations later grudgingly acknowledged that their coverage was insufficiently critical of government pronouncements. But that did nothing to ameliorate the tragic consequences of an unnecessary war, including a financial toll of more than $2 trillion, a sum that is likely to increase substantially with benefits to war veterans over time and other expenses, as well as — far more important — the deaths of thousands upon thousands of soldiers and innocent civilians, including women and children. [12]

Could the Iraq War have been prevented if the public had been better informed before the invasion about the specious official statements, faulty logic, and breathtaking manipulations of public opinion and governmental decision-making processes? I believe the answer to that grim question is very possibly yes, and it will haunt me and others in my profession for years to come. [13]

Congressional oversight focused almost entirely on the quality of the US government’s pre-war intelligence — not the veracity of the highest-ranking US officials’ public statements or the objectivity and logic of their decision making in instigating the war.

Did President Bush and other officials from his administration lie about Iraq intentionally and deliberately? It’s hard to tell without unfettered access to the principals and their internal communications. Certainly, we should never underestimate the human capacity for self-delusion — too often, we find it easy to believe what we want to believe. But the fact is that they have avoided the glare of formal scrutiny about their personal responsibility for the litany of repeated, false statements in the run-up to war. Under the Republicans in 2005 and 2006, and the Democrats in 2007 and 2008, there was no congressional investigation into this specific question. Congressional oversight focused almost entirely on the quality of the US government’s pre-war intelligence — not the veracity of the highest-ranking US officials’ public statements or the objectivity and logic of their decision making in instigating the war. Nor in 2009 did the new Democratic president Barack Obama, his administration, or the Democratic Congress evince any interest in investigating this politically sensitive subject. There may be no more telling example of what has happened to congressional oversight in Washington in recent decades.

Investigating this tale of dishonesty by those in power and acquiescence on the part of those charged with reporting the truth has been a disheartening experience for me. Even more sobering, however, is the fact that the Iraq War deception, with its 935 public, shameless lies, is simply the latest and most egregious story of truth betrayed that I’ve witnessed or reported on over the past five decades. My career in journalism has coincided with a tragic period in American history — one in which falsehood has increasingly come to dominate our public discourse, and in which the bedrock values of honesty, transparency, accountability and integrity we once took for granted have been steadily eroded.

Excerpted from 935 Lies by Charles Lewis. Copyright © 2014 by Charles Lewis. Excerpted by permission of PublicAffairs, an imprint of the Perseus Books Group. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

Charles Lewis founded the Center for Public Integrity in 1989 and served as its executive director until January 2005. Previously, he worked as an investigative reporter for ABC News and as a producer of the CBS News program 60 Minutes. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, Christian Science Monitor, Columbia Journalism Review, The Nation and many other publications.

  • submit to reddit
  • Anonymous

    0 comments? This cartel of death has caused our country more problems than we may never get out of. We are universally hated and we can throw that at the feet of the Bushes. And a very compliant Congress.

  • Anonymous

    My Uncle Riley got an almost
    new red GMC Canyon just by some parttime working online with a laptop. visit
    their website F­i­s­c­a­l­p­o­s­t­.­C­O­M­

  • JonThomas

    On one level, people know they were lied to… but on another, they don’t want to face the implications of what that means.

  • Deborah Smith Author

    I agree. Because it means our government is corrupt at the highest levels and our major media is a propaganda machine owned by political cronies, so where do we go from there? The solutions could tear this country apart.

  • Anonymous

    It both annoys and saddens me to think that both the Obama Administration and the Congress have made the decision that Americans cannot withstand the objective inquiry into this issue. That they conclude it is is better to let the transgressions die quietly rather than officially examine and learn from them. Bad people did bad things. It used to be we were a nation that would not tolerate that. It makes us seem unworthy of the democracy the Founding Fathers gave us.

  • woodguy11

    that my dear is exactly what this country needs. The cronyism has gone too far and these war criminals need to be tried .I’m tired of taking it in the ass from the government .It is time we the people take some action .instead we sit back and wait and hope this will go away. This will never be fixed from the inside.We need to take our government back from all the corruption

  • John Hanna

    The Press themselves are the biggest, deliberate purveyors of the lies…puts the public at a disadvantage.

  • Jean Sutherland

    If the administration did do this you would then see a trial at the Hague and criminal convictions for war crimes. It’s because of this I believe the truth is being withheld. Maybe Americans could withstand the truth, but the world, represented by the Hague would not let it pass.

  • Veteran

    A large portion of people refuse to admt they were wrong, were duped, and fools. The power of the ego is utilized by these liars. THEY know that people will continue to save face, at their own expence and that of their own country. Human nature exploited .

  • JonThomas

    Hang in there.

  • John Hanna

    Of course, they want sleeping dogs to lie. Whether neo-lib or neo-con, foreign policy in the US is bi-partisan. It has always been this way and there are no innocents. Everyone has the same skeletons in the closet and want them to remain there. Never, ever expect truth. US politics is an entertainment show to give some hope that someone will or can do something sometime. It is not going to happen.

  • sparkeyjames

    Author must have been hidden under a rock for some time. This sort of crap has been going on in American politics since the mid 1800’s. Only now it has reached a fevered pace. Smears, lies and propaganda it’s how the right and to some extent the left present their policies and beliefs to the rest of us.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with not beating oneself up too much- but it’s wonderful for many Americans to finally be acknowledging of such matters. It’s important we be brutally honest with ourselves.

  • Anonymous

    Pay ‘Woody’ no mind. There are plenty of solutions which avoid a 2nd US Civil War- and anyone cheering for our country to be ‘torn apart’- claiming THAT is what we need- is only doing so because their ideology requires a 2nd US Civil War to ‘hide behind’.

    Only one faction of America has been lobbying to ‘slice the metaphorical baby in half with Solomon’s sword’ since the Iraq War was undertaken- and that is the conservative republicans.

    If we give President Obama both the House of Reps and the Senate- a more cooperative Congress will work to strengthen the recovery and right wrongs. conservative republicans would rather burn the country down as opposed to let that happen. Stop listening to conservative republican lies- Vote True Blue in 2014 and the future for our children will be in much better shape.

  • Anonymous

    We can still do something about Iraq. We can’t do jack about the Berlin Wall. Casting the Geneva Conventions aside and implementing torture was brand new under the Bush/Cheney regime. Let’s Hope it’s time for them to pay the piper. Getting started is the hardest part.

  • wjkolar

    Lets start then with the present
    United States Drone Strikes Defy International Law, Un Charter, Geneva Conventions,_un_charter,_geneva_conventions

  • Sheri Drips

    I think the world itself was also in a state of shock as the world’s banks were crumbling. It was the perfect time and place to bring forth this lie.

  • Sheri Drips

    I believe that. I’m all for that. But Obama had the House and the Senate. How did we lose it?

  • Andrew Kac

    Vote true Blue? We did and they let us down. Look at Syria, Ukraine and again Iraq, ‘true blue’ are looking for another war.

  • Anonymous

    We know they did it. We know why they did it from what they did. The rich became fabulously rich. Costs went up and the middle class became mired in a debt they never created. Inflation doubled and was played up as your house worth doubling, when nothing happened but that your taxes went up while the rich paid ever less and less.

    What we don’t know is why they were never tried for the obvious infractions of the laws, both in our country and the world. Torture, invasion of a non-threatening country. Mass murder of people that never attacked us. Why are Bush and Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove and Rice not serving multiple life sentences. They are directly responsible for the deaths of almost a million people. If you kill two you get the death penalty. Why isn’t every state in the Union not arresting them for getting their citizens killed!

  • Anonymous

    Screw off. You don’t apologize because you didn’t get enough people to grow a backbone! We already have laws to stop this kind of abuse. No one used them because the rich and the powerful told us not to.

  • Anonymous

    The papers used to be paid for by subscribers. Their sales depended on their honesty and integrity. Now they are paid for by advertisers. Their new dependence is on selling what a corporation( and the rich that own them) is telling them to sell. The news is now for sale. It’s going to take a little while to understand that we can no longer trust the news outlets.

  • Anonymous

    I’m not sure, but the way you wrote that almost makes me think nothing wrong happened because the World Court didn’t do their job. Is that what you meant? Because i believe if this had been done to Israel, Bush and Cheney would be dead today. Rice would be underground and running. Rove would have been tried in Israel and publicly executed. And I wouldn’t have faulted them for it!

  • Anonymous

    Maybe it’s time to tear it apart. try democracy or Socialism this time. Democracy is what we thought we had. Capitalism is what we got. capitalism only works when you marry it to something like Christian morality or a Protestant work ethic. They have robots. They don’t need your work ethic anymore. They need your money. But soon enough there will be enough robots and compute and data that we won’t need money. They will have to have something else to measure their worth and their power. They need bodies. Not brains. Just willing working buying bodies. And they are lining up for that game right now. i think that’s what the wars were partially for. To learn how to control us. They did a really good job.

  • Anonymous

    Republicans spent a great deal of time and money to make sure they could. Fox News is a 247 fear hate propaganda machine. gerrymandering and pouring millions into changing the laws to allow them to weaken minority and union voting. They are trying to become what we fought to get out from under 200 years ago, and doing a damn fine job of it. truth and an understanding of truth can wipe all those gains they made, useless in one year. Simply continue to expose them. Destroy the trust all that fear gave them.

  • Guest

    Soldiers were sent to die in vain. That is very clear now. It was corporate welfare to big business AND a re-election campaign. We should all hold them accountable now. Most importantly, never let the USA be deceived by any administration into sending young people off to die.

  • Anonymous

    The above article is too long. Say it simply, say it plainly.

  • JonThomas

    While it is indeed good practice to be concise, keep in mind that this is an except from an entire book on the subject. :-)

  • Jean Sutherland

    I was referring to the Obama administration not bringing it to the court. We all know the Bush/Cheney administration DID wrong.

  • Jerry Squarey

    Because they made huge profits for themselves and their cronies so it just silently faded away.There were/are many Congressional members from many states that also profited.
    Big money has a way of sanitizing things.
    In true war monger fashion, Dick “The Snake” Cheny has been spouting off on national television how he would increase the military budget, send thousands of troops back to Iraq, and start it all over again. Must be dementia kicking in.

  • Cynthia Davis

    If the American Public knew even 5 percent of the deliberate deception and crimes there could be wholesale chaos.
    Given the rate of disappointment, media play to make such things appear “normal” and the dumbing down of the great majority below a top privileged few; it appears the smoke, mirrors and diversions have worked and are still working exceptionally well.
    Even knowing that there were war crimes committed – the perpetrators are securely ensconced and “safe” from justice.
    I’m exhausted from pointing out the obvious.
    Knowing truth and skepticism is dead all I can do is wonder how people responsible for the deaths of millions of innocents can be idolized and parading peacocks with NO SHAME at all.
    Then I remember it’s the triumph of psychopaths over all that is good and I mourn the loss of our race and humanity to such foolishness.
    We could have been a great interstellar species – instead we are headed for extinction.

  • Anonymous

    Butler turned P.Bush in for his treason,congress covered it up.

  • Jeffrey Smith

    could someone tell me where Clinton’s Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is on the list of 935 lies, is it in first place where it should be?

  • Anonymous

    They only got away with 900+ lies because the press refused to call them out on it and the public allowed it to become one more partisan spitball fight, too many people refused to consider any fact that contradicted what they wanted to believe and the press was more than willing to discredit anyone who challenged power. A near black out of war protests that took place across the nation. Bill Moyers was one of the only sources for the truth during that dark time, thank you Bill. We’re a very sad country.

  • Samuel E. Warren Jr.

    “Nine Hundred Thirty Five Lies” by the Baby Bush Administration. Darn. I bet they were shooting for an even 1,000. Why are the reasons for ‘The Iraq War’ such a surprise ? Baby Bush stated in an interview on the subject of Saddam Hussein, “. . .he tried to kill my daddy.”

    Americans are wrapped around the axle about ‘The IRS Scandal’, “Mismanagement Of The VA”, and the reports of illegal aliens coming over the border, but the Abu Ghraib prison-abuse scandal stories seldom got a yawn back in the Baby Bush days.

    It is sad that Americans were lied to by the so-called chief executive.

    Someone get busy and call the Kennedy Center — time to figure out a way to give Baby Bush a prestigious award.

    What is unforgivable is, so many Americans died to support the Lies of the Liars.

  • Anonymous

    As noted in the article, truth is essential to democracy. My undergraduate degree was in journalism, and though I was never a practicing journalist, I am appalled at the non-truths, half-truths and missing truths that our leaders foist upon us. During the Bush administration, and particularly during the war, everywhere I went a TV set was tuned to Fox News. Was Fox a part of the plan? I personally believe that it was… The shrill sensationalism that it reported as a “balanced” approach nauseated me.
    As for all the government-assisted production of news clips, and how they came to be broadcast — radio and television stations are licensed by the FCC. It would not have taken much for someone like Dick Cheney to threaten problems for the broadcasters if they didn’t toe a line. Of course, the broadcasters did as they were told.
    Great article!

  • Samuel E. Warren Jr.

    Fox News did seem to be another name for “Baby Bush Broadcasting”, during that goosestep regime. The Media overall is a group that never seems to win. Back in the “Tricky Dick” days before Watergate when The Media was questioning the official line coming out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue people would whine, “that the White House is getting beat up on.” Nixon put Spiro T. Agnew out front and The Media seemed to like and trust him. Then, the IRS showed up and Agnew went away. Nixon still couldn’t get a headline. Dr. Henry Kissinger, certainly was no Bob Hope or Jack Benny, but, The Media respected him and his efforts at shuttle diplomacy. Of course, once Dr. Kissinger’s religious faith became known as Jewish, he really became the certain of attention. Thanks to Watergate, Tricky Dick finally got his headlines. Then, people either gave The Media credit for exposing the cover-up or blamed them for taking so long. People always want to shift the “Blame” from themselves. The idea of Democracy relies on an “Informed Citizenry”, not on blame for The Media or the sheepish willingness to go along with egghead press releases. First time I saw Dick Cheney on television, I knew I would not buy a used car from him — and I sure as heck didn’t vote for him. I grew up in ‘The Ozarks’ and in those days people knew not only you, but generations of your family. If your mom or dad had a less than sterling reputation and you wanted to go into politics, then, you moved to another state. I was not impressed with Vice President Bush as a Vice President. And, when his son announced he was running I knew America had already been “Bushwacked” before the GOP campaign even got up and running. And, I sure as heck didn’t vote for Baby Bush — I remembered his daddy. Then, I remembered the old Ozarks’ cliche about “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.” The newspapers, magazines and TV — The Media — only confirmed what I ‘Feared’ another suit with no idea what it meant to be a “Leader”, much less, “The Leader Of The Free World.” But, the responsibility for the type of government we get rest with us — the individual voter — not with The Media and not with Official Press Releases.

  • Anonymous

    Deflection gets you nowhere.

  • Papa John

    bush lies allmost as much as sarah pailin is stoopid and fox news is suck.

  • Anonymous

    It should be mentioned that Fox News played a big role in the US public’s beliefs re. WMDs. In the months following the invasion, on several occasions I recollect hearing Fox ‘journalists’ proclaiming that government officials in Baghdad had announced the discovery of Saddam’s WMDs, and full details would be forthcoming in a couple of days. No other news outlets were mentioning such stories – and needless to say, there were never any follow-up stories.
    As we all know, Fox has a large audience, and their credulousness and ignorance is legendary.

  • Adolf Hochhaltinger

    The question: Why did the Lord Almighty hide the world’s greatest amount of American oil just under Iraq’s sand?

  • Chris Jonsson

    Not me. I don’t believe anything Bush or Cheney say for a minute.

  • Chris Jonsson

    Not to mention the New York Times.

  • Roland Duca

    Bush and Cheney should be tried for crime against humanity……

  • William Donelson

    Sociopaths Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, Rice et al WAR CRIMINALS: 150,000+ murdered in Iraq FOR MONEY (and the death toll still increases EVERY day)… And bankrupting America at the same time. Why aren’t these b’stards in prison?

  • Zeb Minas

    Absolutely the media has a responsibility here. “Informed Citizenry”… How does the citizenry get informed? Where are they going to get access to information? From “official” sources, or from “media”. Since it’s commonly acknowledged that “official source” are not reliable, one must depend on media (either that or everyone has access to all official material, which will never happen). There is no independent media anymore – all owned in one way or another by mega-corporations, so why should we expect the media to seek out truth?

    Is anyone up for funding a “real” news organization? If we the citizens put our money where out mouths are, perhaps we have a chance.

    What do I want in a truly independent news agency?

    1. guarantees of full and complete disclosure of all funding sources
    2. hire only people with verifiable background in investigative journalism
    3. clearly-declared political position for every member of staff, so we the people can decide for ourselves if any of their biases are creeping in to their reporting
    4. guarantee of release of background information that led to a story after 50 years (so we will at least know who was involved at what level and for what purpose)
    5. the highest-paid staff member makes no more than 10 times what the lowest-paid employee makes
    6. board members for this organization are appointed on a rotating basis from public figures regardless of so-called stature in society (as is so often the case). Individual citizens wishing to join the board must make their case online and be willing to be scrutinized by the public
    7. the mission statement of this organization will be “the whole truth and nothing but the truth”

    I would be willing to support such an organization… If 50 million of us ordinary citizens contribute $5 per year, this news organization will have operating funds of $250M per year! Contribute $50 per year, and we have $2.5B available… Drowning out Fox, CNN, MSNBC, Rush, Beck, et al becomes a real possibility!


    IF a normal citizen lies to a police officer it’s a felony,,,,,,,if a politician lie’s to the people, they get a raise!!!!!!

  • Thomas Thompson

    Remember the portable trailers that were allegedly deployed around Iraq to make WMD’s? I was caring for my ill father at the time that Gen. Colin Powel presented diagrams of these trailers complete with well produced diagrams of eyewitness descriptions of the interior of those trailers. I will never forget my now deceased father jumping to his feet, removing his oxygen mask, pointing to the televisions set and hollering, “what the hell…those are for producing helium.” Dad, as a marine engineer had at one point in his career worked for NOAA and had maintained such equipment to produce helium for weather balloons deployed from NOAA research vessels. Several years into the war our government begrudgingly admitted that in fact that was ‘probably” what the alleged WMD trailers actually were used for. Either the Bush administration, with all of its vast resources of experts made a honest mistake…or their was a concerted effort to deceive the American people and the United Nations. I know what I think. Dad was a smart guy…but there are a lot of smart and knowledgeable people.

  • Thomas Thompson
  • terry printz

    thank you for supporting my take on recorded civilization. who would not like to be a fly on the wall of any castle dating back through history

  • Barbara Mullin

    How come all Congress does is investigate Benghazi, the IRS and try to get rid of Obamacare when 935 lies about the Iraq War are never mentioned?

  • Pisces Poet

    The excerpt is too short. I want to read the entire book!

  • Larry Perkins

    I went to the page to sign your petition. There’s a notice posted saying something to the effect that the petition is closed due to a lack of sufficient signatures. Seems to me this is something ‘We The People’ ought to keep hammering at until the case against Bush and company is brought to trial.

  • Anonymous

    I guess Americans are, generally, sleepwalking. I tried to publicize this through social media and got basically zero response.

    We are about to go to war with ISIS, which is a DIRECT result of the Bush invasion of Iraq. I cannot believe that so many Americans just roll over and accept what appear to be, if not outright illegal acts, certainly acts that show a complete lack of moral and intellectual integrity. Accountability from our government must be demanded by the people.

    Thanks for attempting to sign the petition. I’m just giving up in disgust.

  • Susan Wood

    If you want to get people to believe a string of lies, it helps a lot to frighten the heck out of them, and convince them that they have to trust you if you want to be safe. Now, will someone please ask George Bush why he was so adamant about refusing to listen to warnings in the summer of 2001? Why he not only ignored the PDB entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike Within the U.S.” but sneered at Richard Clarke and then went fishing? Why John Ashcroft was screaming at attorneys in the Justice Department that he did not want to hear another word about terrorism? I’m no truther, but I can easily believe people who want a war anyway might sit back and do nothing if they thought someone was about to hand them a great excuse for a war.

  • Anonymous

    President Obama assumed office under some of the worst conditions our country has ever seen and it was of no help to have what can only be labelled an obstructionist Republican congress the last # of years. He deserves credit for much of what he did to salvage the economy and to improve how the U.S. is viewed around the globe. Both are still in disrepair and I think that speaks less to his failures and more to how truly horrific Bush and company left the country. And he has also made a number of mistakes – his failure to embrace single-payer health care at the urging of Max Baucus and others will impede efforts for moral and cost effective health-care for decades to come. He also did not understand the mandate the American people had given him and in so doing he squandered the progressive agenda that was behind him…

    But, his biggest failure was abdicating his responsibility to hold those who lied us into war with Iraq accountable. His argument to the American people was that we needed to heal and move forward as a country but that’s a load of garbage. And, even if it were true, it was not worth the conveyance that ANY actions could be undertaken with impunity even if those actions directly (not indirectly) resulted in the deaths of 100s of thousands of people, will cost 2.3 trillion dollars (independent analysis of war costs 2013) and pulled resources away from critical infrastructure needs here at home. President Obama’s failure in this regard transcended ideology and will have a lasting negative impact upon our very Republic. We should have aired our dirty laundry, held what we now know were (and remain) war crimes to the light of day, and used this to reject that modis operandi on behalf of our country – instead his decision reinforced the likelihood this will occur in the future to the detriment of all.

  • Jim Em

    I wonder how many of those standing behind those speaking these lies said to themselves, “this is BS.”
    And where are all the people who were screaming for war today? Answer: Afraid to admit they were sheep.

  • Anonymous

    They’re out rationalizing it by saying Saddam was a bad guy and that the US “saved” them. By killing 1 million Iraqis.

  • Anonymous

    When a person is in office by dictate of the Supreme Court and not via election, no good will follow.

  • Anonymous

    Because rich people only go to jail if they rip off other rich people. Bernie Madoff, for example.

  • Jim Em

    I have seen figures all over the map of the number of Iraqi’s killed, I tend to pay attention to the low figures which is from a hundred thousand to several hundred thousand. In any case, our leadership back then is guilty of mass murder regardless if it was 1,000 or 1,000,000.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t know that this is true, watching the votes of my federal D representatives in congress. They’re as Wall St voting as their peers. We need to vote nonR/nonD, because the rot starts in the parties.

  • Anonymous

    Not sleepwalking. Splintered. Diffused. 360 degrees of attack by the 1%. 360 degrees of responses by the 99%. 1 rotten congress.

  • Anonymous


  • Thomas Thompson

    The sad fact is the President did not have enough support from his party to push through a “one payer” system. Too many Democrats balked heading into mid-term elections. He of course would have preferred the whole enchilada but it simply wasn’t politically doable. Like Canada, we to will have to use the ACA as a stepping-stone towards true universal healthcare.

  • DavidD

    I don’t think that they were bright enough to do that but were criminal enough to kick off a war that exploited the 9/11 attack.This was a war they wanted to have before 9/!! in the delusion that they could control events long enough to rip off Iraq oil and thier supporters could justify massive war profits.
    It wasn’t thier kids that were going to die or come back as damaged goods.
    In about every small Texas town I see at least one grave of someone’s child killed in Iraq.
    It was a crime and those responsible should be made to pay.

  • Kym Chaffin

    What’s also disturbing is the rise of so-called, “advocacy journalism” means a lot of the journalistic media has been bought off by corporate America at the same time as our Congressional politicians have been bought off completely by the need to seek massive donations to get reelected so they can then seek yet more corporate money. No one represents the actual people, just the corporations while many ordinary Americans are too spoiled or lazy to find out what’s going on for themselves.

  • Anonymous

    I still don’t know why we went to war.

  • Skeletonman


    And so that W could both save and one up Poppy Bush at the same time.

  • DrLearnALot

    Not all of us believed them. Thousands of us were in the street.

  • Carolyn 4444

    We went to war so that rich heads of Industry could make money hand over fist – or rather body over body – in the upswing that a war economy brings to the stronger nation involved. Look up the Military Industrial Complex.

  • Wayne Rizor

    Big media failed the American public and facilitated the administration and its lies, because they are corporations whose primary goal is to make money. They operate under the idea that they cannot offend a portion of their viewing public out of fear that they will lose that portion and thus receive lower ratings and suffer commercial losses. So as a result, they rolled over and played dead when they should have been out there holding the administration accountable for those lies. There is one more page to be played out in this mess and yet against it will only happen IF the Media and its reporters “grow a set” and demand that GWB and his administration be tried as war criminals under the Geneva Convention for those criminal acts. If America is ever to regain the international prestige that it once had, it must admit to is wrongs and set the record straight by putting Bush and Cheney, along with their accomplices on trial.

  • Charles David

    The problem with telling a lie is, you become a liar. The problem with remaining willfully (and woefully) ignorant is, you become a knowing disbeliever – a deformation of reason ….

  • Alvie S

    Many faceless industrialists got together and orchestrated this senseless war. The public will never know who they were or how much money they made as a result of the lies that took us to Iraq.

  • Anonymous

    Iraq was one of the worst military blunders in American history as current events show. Many good men and women are gone or permanently disabled. A reporter a couple years ago asked the general who took Kandahar, Afghanistan the first time why we had to take it again, and his one word answer was “Iraq”. Thanks for nothing, Bush.

  • Anonymous

    I totally agree with you on THAT! When he was first elected, I was APALLED! The first words out of my mouth were “I know exactly the first thing he will do, invade Iraq for his Daddy’s sake”………..and shortly thereafter, wasn’t that exactly what he did, he would have done that with or without 9/11……..9/11 was just a “convenient” excuse……it made NO SENSE that he took his eye off the real target, Al Qaida in Afghanistan. I AM so angry that that whole Administration is not going to bear the punishment for the crimes, treason, and betrayal of the People they SO Richly Deserve under any “Rule of Law”, which this Country is always so boisterously touting itself as…..let a “little man” do these things on a smaller scale, they would be hounded and prosecuted to hilt, but the Big Guys, well they can commit these awful, devastating, humanity crushing things…..and walk off into the Sunset whistling a merry tune. completely unencumbered by the least sense of guilt……….’nough to make a body gag!

  • Mitch Powell

    and to this day, few seem to draw the connection to ISIL.

  • Anonymous

    Wonderfully said! Thanks you……….I feel such a sense of despair in your final words…… least that’s the way they made Me feel…….I do agree with you on the likelihood that this leaves us so open to further such circumstance…..the tone and temper of the current GOP and FAX Noise, leaves THAT quite apparent… much manipulation of facts, outright lies, misdirection, obfuscation, bullying, it’s so self-evidently in Our unfortunate Future……and the “Sheople” don’t have a Clue! Makes me glad that I am not a young person and have to despairingly witness the demise of the ‘greatest sense of promise on Earth, my Country, the U.S.A.

  • Anonymous

    I for the life of me can’t understand why we let Bush lead us into this war. The worst part is that he didn’t win the first election, Gore did. When are we going to hold our elected officials accountable for they’re actions?

  • Anonymous

    Thank you Thomas, that is an incredible fact to learn!!!! thank YOU SO Much for sharing your Dad’s words……..I believe him! AND believe it was a successful maneuver of deception ……NOT a mistake……..more people need to know what your Father knew……. would you mind if I repost this on FB? it’s very important.

  • Andy Morris

    the outcomes, the destabilization of the region, the transfer of wealth from the middle class to the oligarchs, the indoctrination of young people into a culture of unquestionable Nationalism

  • Itoldyouso

    “This stubborn refusal to face the facts about Iraq continues today for millions of Americans. [1] Investigating this tale of dishonesty by those in power and acquiescence
    on the part of those charged with reporting the truth has been a
    disheartening experience for me. Even more sobering, however, is the
    fact that the Iraq War deception, with its 935 public, shameless lies,
    is simply the latest and most egregious story of truth betrayed that
    I’ve witnessed or reported on over the past five decades.”


    You think that is hard to expose in the Main Stream Media? For the last 30 years this lie has been told by GOP every year, to this date they claim that “Trickle Down Economy” via “Tax cuts for the Rich” via “Deregulation” work for the 99% or the country as a whole.
    Please help debunk this GOP lie too.
    Main stream Media have to start debunking these two myths, that;

    1) “Trickle Down Economy” via “Tax cuts for the Rich” via “Deregulation” work for the 99% or the country as a whole.
    2) “Economic inequality was good for economic growth!”
    And put them to rest as alternative policies.
    “New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet said that he “absolutely” agreed with Times reporter James Risen that the mainstream media had “failed” after the Sept.
    11, 2001 attacks.”
    Do you really think this is the only occasion?
    The good news is that two myths that caused great confusion over the last 35 years are now headed to the trash bin of history. While many prominent pundits may still repeat them to demonstrate that prominent pundits really don’t have to care about reality,
    everyone in the reality-based community now knows them to be nonsense. The
    first is the myth of the “Trickle Down Economy” via “Tax cuts for the Rich” via “Deregulations” and the second one is “Economic inequality was good for economic growth.”
    There has been reports, articles, studies with solid statistics, and historical experiments of the last 35 years of three GOP Presidents’ economic policies, including the
    deregulations of most of corporate laws, and the removal of the Glass–Steagall
    Act for banks, pushing and signing NAFTA agreement that Democratic Presidents
    have done.
    All and all there has been a lot of attention on data and reports that demonstrate rising inequality in the US. Thomas Piketty’s big book, ‘Capital in the 21st Century’, came out in English last spring, but some of the research that his book is based on appeared much earlier.
    Yet this has been minority view in the Media, and Financial News Channels, the Editorials of every major newspaper in this country, and most Economists who has access to all sorts of Media platforms (paid for by the 1% to take position and support their idea) like Samuelson of WP.
    Why this persistence of Media position?, the position of the US Congress, and even the position of the President that was elected on the platform of “Change”?
    The economic policy of “Trickle Down Economy” via “Tax cuts for the Rich” via “Deregulations” and “Economic inequality was good for economic growth!” must be debunked by the Main Stream Media.
    So is it wondering, why our supposed “Free Media” would not address this Cancerous type of economic disease on the Main Stream Medias, on the daily and nightly programs and articles, and to debunk the ongoing GOP claim that “Tax cuts for the Rich” would create jobs, or “Trickle Down Economy” really works and is good for the 99%, or why economic inequality was good for economic growth?!
    Main stream Media must start debunking these two myths, that;
    1) “Trickle Down Economy” via “Tax cuts for the Rich” via “Deregulations” work for the 99% or the country as a whole.
    2) “Economic inequality was good for economic growth!”
    And put them to rest as alternative policies.
    Good Luck!

  • Itoldyouso

    Americans are politically …

    FoxNews viewers, who thinks they are in the
    1% category, and try to parrot like them and carry the water for the 1% agenda,
    (See “History of the world part 1”) but unfortunately they live in their small homes working 6 days a week, pay check to pay check, and suffer just like the rest of the 99%, and just imagining that they are part of the 1%.
    Shame on lazy American people who are so politically ‘Dumb’ and ‘Numb’, and they do not know who is running their country. These politically ‘Dumb’ and ‘Numb’ people continue to go to vote for the same GOP and Democratic candidates who have been chosen and financed by the 1% elite.

    These politically ‘Dumb’ and ‘Numb’ people continue to Watch FoxNews as their source of true news and what is happening, and call other so called Free Media, a liberal Media. Little do they know that there is not a Liberal and/or Conservative Media, there is only one ‘controlled’ Corporate Media, from different angle, who is running the 1% elite’s agenda, and would not let the 99% to know or to understand who is really running this Country.

  • Itoldyouso

    Americans are politically …

    FoxNews viewers, who thinks they are in the 1% category, and try to parrot like them and carry the water for the 1% agenda, (See “History of the world part 1”) but unfortunately they live in their small homes working 6 days a week, pay check to pay check, and suffer just like the rest of the 99%, and just imagining that they are part of the 1%.
    Shame on lazy American people who are so politically ‘Dumb’ and ‘Numb’, and they do not know who is running their country. These politically ‘Dumb’ and ‘Numb’ people continue to go to vote for the same GOP and Democratic candidates who have been chosen and financed by the 1% elite.
    These politically ‘Dumb’ and ‘Numb’ people continue to Watch FoxNews as their source of true news and what is happening, and call other so called Free Media, a liberal Media. Little do they know that there is not a Liberal and/or Conservative Media, there is only one ‘controlled’ Corporate Media, from different angle, who is running the 1% elite’s agenda, and would not let the 99% to know or to understand who is really running this Country.

  • Rishicash

    More accurately I would call Iraq a political blunder more than a military blunder.

  • Rishicash

    Don’t you remember the “smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud” and “yellow cake” and “aluminum tubes” and “they hate our freedom” and….?

  • Rishicash

    I don’t know that I really believe that. I think what happened is that Obama let the Republicans take over and control the narrative of healthcare reform and turned it into “death panels for granny”. Had he had some balls like Elizabeth Warren, I believe he could have made Single Payer happen. Instead, we have the compromised mess that is the ACA that few people really like. He absolutely blew a golden opportunity that we will likely never see again.

  • Julia

    Don’t forget the money lenders, the shareholders, the pension funds, the stock market traders, et al, as well, ad nauseam….they all make money out of war, and the money they make is being used to buy up more and more of the world’s precious resources….the ones that they can’t steal, that is.

  • Marshall McComb

    Here is a remarkable “unfettered access to the principals and their internal communications.”

    For his 2004 book “The Price of Loyalty,” Ron Suskind interviewed President Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, Paul O’Neill, and other members of Bush’s National Security Council (NSC). They said that the overthrow of Saddam Hussein was the focus of the very first two Bush/Cheney NCS meetings, not because Iraq had WMD, but as a “demonstration model” of U.S. unilateral military power. The meeting on February 1, 2001, ended with Bush saying, “Fine, Go find me a way to do this” (Page 86).

  • Ted Seay

    Sorry — the Syrian chemical weapons came from where, if not Iraq?

  • Alex Kassel

    “Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.” –Herman Goering, Nazi Reichsmarshall & Luftwaffe Chief, 4/18/1946 @ Nuremburg trials. This is the script W, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others followed in the 10/02 – 3/03 lead up to our invasion of Iraq.

  • Anonymous

    As Lenin once said, “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”.

  • Steven Field

    There is such an organization. It’s DemocracyNow! with Amy Goodman.

  • moderator

    To The Community:

    Please stop flagging comments that clearly do not break the comment policy. Disagreeing with a post is not grounds for flagging. If this continues we will be forced to close the comment section.


  • Anonymous

    Why isn’t there a mention of L Paul Bremer? Surely in Iraqi lies, the suggestion that the war to implement neoliberal policy in Iraq was the same as the minor skirmish to remove Saddam Hussein from power ought to count pretty high.

  • Anonymous

    What astonishes me is how many people still believe that the minor battle to remove Saddam Hussein was part of the same war as the 8 year conflict. Between the two there were hundreds of thousands of people protesting peacefully, “yes, yes elections, no, no, selections”. The real war didn’t start until the peaceful protests failed.

  • Anonymous

    What about the controlled demolition of the three buildings in new york city ? the biggest lie of them all.

  • Anonymous

    Try… Syria.

  • Ted Seay

    Really? So they had the infrastructure to produce all the CW found there…fascinating.

    Sources, please?

  • Anonymous

    Carl Lewis is the founder of “Public Integrity”?

    There is not much integrity in writing an article with a headline that reads “The Lies We Believed About Iraq” and then focuses solely on The Bush Administration but fails to provide any concrete details of any lies. It does however say, “Did President Bush and other officials from his administration lie about Iraq intentionally and deliberately? It’s hard to tell without unfettered access to the principals and their internal communications.”

    Any real integrity would not have just focused on The Bush Administration but would have also included statements made by The Clinton Administration and the Democratic Party making the case (before and during the Bush Administration) for stopping Iraq’s WMD program.

    Democratic Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction

    “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”

    –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    “If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”

    –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

    “Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”

    –Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

    “He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”

    –Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

    “[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”

    Letter to President Clinton, signed by:

    — Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

    “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”

    -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

    “Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”

    — Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

    “There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”

    Letter to President Bush, Signed by:

    — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

    “We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them.”

    — Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    “We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”

    — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    “Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”

    — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    “We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”

    — Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    “The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…”

    — Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    “I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”

    — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    “There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”

    — Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    “He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do”

    — Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”

    — Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    “We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”

    — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    “Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real…”

    — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

  • Michael Clark

    And the difference between the two Presidents? One talked about it and didn’t kill anyone. The other did something and killed well over one hundred thousand innocent people. Do you really think that they are equivalent?

  • Michael Clark

    Rumsfeld, under Mr. Reagan.

  • Michael Clark

    James Bamford, “A Pretext for War” explains it quite well. Excellent book.

  • Anonymous

    Kyle Smith writes:

    The idea that “Bush lied” is itself a lazy, ill-informed and false statement.

    As Judge Laurence Silberman, co-chairman of the Commission on the
    Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass
    Destruction, wrote in The Wall Street Journal
    last week, essentially nobody in the Washington intelligence community
    doubted the major report that Iraq had an active WMD program in 2002.

    The National Intelligence Estimate delivered to the Senate and
    President Bush said there was a 90 percent certainty of WMDs. Democrat
    George Tenet, the Clinton CIA director who continued to serve under
    Bush, said the case for WMDs was a “slam dunk.”

    John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid and Joe Biden
    all looked at the intelligence and voted to authorize force. Sen. Jay
    Rockefeller argued strongly for the war. Then, years later, when it
    wasn’t going so well, he published a highly politicized report ripping
    There is a serious case to be made against the Iraq War, but it’s a
    lot more complicated than the playground taunt, “Bush lied about WMDs.”

  • Anonymous

    Apparently my long-winded reply isn’t going to be approved… to sum up: Your pet theory is based on “gut feeling” opinions of a few revisionists who would love to keep people at odds on this subject. I’m not googling this for you, go do your own research and note that none of the intelligence agencies could find credible evidence to support this right-side talking (obfuscating) point.

  • Anonymous

    Here is a little bit of help for you, in case you don’t want to look for yourself — in the 1970s and 80s Russia and Egypt were suppliers of chemical weapons to Syria. In the ’90s and 2000s, Syria purchased many of the complex precursors for chemical weapons from western European chemical companies. Yes, the same precursors that are used to make Teflon are used to make… Sarin.

  • Anonymous

    Lying is part of the coat politicians ware.

  • Michael Clark

    Indeed, oversimplification runs rampant. I recently had a discussion about Benghazi with a colleague. When I questioned the value of continuing investigations, she made the argument that “… the democrats started WWI, WWII, Korea and Vietnam”. I didn’t know what to say… She “won”.

  • Anonymous

    Current POTUS passed 935 before he pledged protection of Constitution ….just ask the enabler Reid while he can still officially pour the Truth Serum liberally….

  • Anonymous

    Why to all of those?
    Lame late due to petty politics here.
    Where were we when Stalin and Mao did what was best for their people by murdering 10’s of millions each or…are those just millions of lies ….

  • Michael Clark

    The rationale to simply flag comments that one doesn’t agree with is consistent with the article’s subject. Rather than just request that commentators refrain from such action, it would be refreshing to see a public notification of who tried to eliminate the opposition.

  • Michael Clark

    Do you not know that there are many Americans who do not meet the criteria you listed, or do you simply want to paint all Americans with a broad brush?

  • Anonymous

    Given the state of unrest in both domestic and foreign policy, it remains to be seen whether American citizens feel themselves betrayed by the Presidency of Barack Obama as they did by the Presidency of George W. Bush. So many “effects” of Executive decision making is not felt until post-presidency when a legacy, if any, organizes itself into American history made, that sticks. Much of American history is written better in hindsight than at the moment of interaction, and trust is increased, or decreased relative to that impression. In general, it is the litmus test for party politics and how good a job they do for the American people, commanding loyalists, or dissenters, in party politics – under democracy.

  • Anonymous

    People may not remember good vs bad, but they rarely forget betrayals!