The Supreme Court’s ‘McCutcheon’ Decision Nuked Campaign Laws in These 11 States (Plus DC)

  • submit to reddit
Supporters for fair elections gather at the Capitol in Albany, New York on Tuesday, March 11, 2014. (AP Photo/Mike Groll)

This post originally appeared at Mother Jones.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court’s five conservative justices struck down the so-called aggregate limit on campaign contributions — that is, the total number of donations within federal limits an individual can make to candidates, parties and committees during a two-year election cycle. Before the court’s decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, there was a $123,200 ceiling on those legal donations; now, a donor can cut as many $2,600 checks to candidates and $5,000 checks to parties as he or she wants. (The $2,600 and $5,000 figures are the maximum direct contributions a donor can give.)

The court’s decision specifically dealt with the federal aggregate limit, but legal experts say McCutcheon will also void similar campaign finance laws in 11 states and the District of Columbia. “The McCutcheon opinion is right from the Supreme Court and what the Supreme Court said is state aggregate limits on top of the federal limit are unconstitutional today, unconstitutional yesterday, unconstitutional 20 years ago,” says David Mitrani, an election lawyer who specializes in state campaign finance law.

Mitrani says the impact of McCutcheon on state-level laws will vary depending on how low a state’s aggregate limit was. Rhode Island and Wisconsin, for instance, limited donors from giving more than $10,000 per calendar year to state political committees. “There are going to be pretty big changes in how money flows into those states,” Mitrani says. In New York state, however, Mitrani says he doesn’t expect as big of an impact when the existing aggregate limit was set at $150,000 a year.

Here are the 11 states (plus DC) where aggregate limits are now likely gutted thanks to the Supreme Court’s McCutcheon decision:

  • Connecticut

    Limits individuals to $30,000 per election cycle (primary and general) to all committees

  • District of Columbia

    Limits individuals to $8,500 per elected office per election year (“election year” includes both primary and general election)

  • Indiana

    Limits corporations and labor organizations to $22,000 per calendar year to all committees

  • Kentucky

    Limits contributors to $1,500 to all PACs per calendar year

  • Louisiana

    Limits contributors to $100,000 to committees per four-year election cycle

  • Massachusetts

    Limits individuals to $12,500 to all candidates per calendar year

  • Maryland

    Limits contributors to $10,000 to all committees per four year cycle (would’ve increased to $24,000 in 2015)

  • Maine

    Limits contributors to $25,000 to candidates per calendar year

  • New York

    Limits contributors to $150,000 per calendar year to all committees. Corporations are limited to $5,000 per calendar year to all committees

  • Rhode Island

    Limits individuals to $10,000 per calendar year to committees

  • Wisconsin

    Limits individuals to $10,000 to committees per calendar year

  • Wyoming

    Limits individuals to $25,000 candidates and PACs per two-year cycle

Andy Kroll is Mother Jones’ dark money reporter, based in the Washington, DC bureau. His work has also appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Detroit News, Salon and TomDispatch, where he’s an associate editor. Follow him on Twitter: @AndyKroll.

  • submit to reddit