Two associates of Pope Francis recently asserted in an article that Catholicism in the US has “fallen into the hands of the religious right” with an intention to “impose its own law and logic on the political arena.” (Photo by Fibonacci Blue | Flickr CC 2.0)
This article originally appeared at Common Dreams.
An article written by two associates of Pope Francis in the Catholic journal La Civiltà Cattolica illustrates vast disagreements between the Pope and conservative American Catholics — a rift which has been growing since Pope Francis was elected in 2013.
The journal is published in Rome and receives Vatican approval before going to press, suggesting that the Pope does not take issue with the thesis of the article, which was published in July and was the subject of an interview with one of its authors in The New York Times Wednesday: that Catholicism in the US has “fallen into the hands of the religious right” with an intention to “impose its own law and logic on the political arena.”
The article takes aim at Steve Bannon, one of Trump’s top strategists, in particular. Bannon is called “a supporter of apocalyptic geopolitics” for his role in the Trump administration’s rolling back of greenhouse gas regulations, and his promotion of anti-immigration policies and rhetoric.
But conservative Catholic voters are also subject to criticism by the piece’s authors, Rev. Antonio Spadaro and Marcelo Figueroa, both confidants of the Pope. The authors accuse ultraconservative “values voters” who place abortion rights above other domestic issues, of attempting to transform the US into “a theocratic type of state,” and compare the worldview of conservative American Catholics and evangelical Christians to that of extremist Muslims.
The article has received a backlash by some conservatives and Catholic leaders who call it “anti-American.”
Antonio Spadaro SJ has a Facebook account. You might want to express your opinion of his anti-American screed. Please be respectful.
— Father Peter West (@fr_pwest) July 19, 2017
But co-author Rev. Spadaro took to Twitter as well, saying his observations had been badly needed in the US.
Considering the allergic reactions, it's clear that the debate opened by @civcatt was long overdue: https://t.co/KfhWUHNDTi
— Antonio Spadaro (@antoniospadaro) Aug. 2, 2017
The gap between Pope Francis and American conservative Catholics widened during the 2016 presidential campaign and following the election of President Donald Trump, whose policies the Pope has criticized. Pope Francis referred to Trump in 2016 as “a person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges,” and said Trump’s anti-immigrant stance was “not Christian,” angering Trump’s Catholic supporters.
Meanwhile, though the Pope has maintained traditional Catholic stances on social issues, he has been warmly embraced by liberal American Catholics as well as many other progressives for his insistence that the Church move beyond its “obsession” with and punitive views on issues like abortion and same-sex marriage, focusing instead on being “a home for all.”
In The Times, Rev. Spadaro said the piece’s main point “was the pope’s argument that religion in the service of politics or power is ideology,” and his objection to “the manipulation of anxiety for political ends.”
