Richard Dawkins on the Truth of Evolution

  • submit to reddit

In this 2004 Moyers Moment from NOW with Bill Moyers, author Richard Dawkins makes the case for evolution’s truth, and assesses the argument of “intelligent design.”

“All material should be studied with an open mind and studied critically. What’s wrong is to single out evolution as any more open to doubt as anything else,” Dawkins tells Bill. “Evolution is about as certain as anything we know.”

  • submit to reddit encourages conversation and debate around issues, events and ideas related to content on Moyers & Company and the website.

  • The editorial staff reserves the right to take down comments it deems inappropriate.
  • Profanity, personal attacks, hate speech, off-topic posts, advertisements and spam will not be tolerated.
  • Do not intentionally make false or misleading statements, impersonate someone else, break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity.

If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.

We need your help with this. If you feel a post is not in line with the comment policy, please flag it so that we can take a look. Comments and questions about our policy are welcome. Please send an email to

Find out more about's privacy policy and terms of service.

  • mel sant

    great interview.

  • nelson.james

    Of course Dawkins also stated emphatically that 98% of our DNA is junk, thus proving that evolution was true. Now we know (thanks to the ENCODE Project) that at least 80% of our DNA is biochemically active. Dawkins couldn’t have been more wrong on this. I wonder how many other things he is wrong about.

  • galt

    ENCODE’s 80% functional turns out to mean just active. 60% (most of it) is just introns full of junk dna, and that’s no new discovery. Dawkins was right. ENCODE press release misled everybody with horrible use of the word function. Also, Dawkins and scientists have been aware for decades that there are non-protein-coding RNAs, both genes and regulatory elements etc.

  • d

    he’s wrong bout everything, and most of science is myth

  • John Robert Pribula

    What an idiotic statement. Science has less myth than religion. Is this where you are coming from?