Are We Heading Towards a Social Mobility Cliff?

  • submit to reddit

Generation X, the Millennials, even the Baby Boomers – all have been in the running for the dubious distinction of being the first generation to fare worse economically than their parents.

The good news is that no generation can yet make that claim. A study released Monday by The Pew Charitable Trusts shows that the vast majority of Americans are doing better than their parents were at the same age — in fact, 84 percent have higher household incomes than the families in which they grew up.

The bad news is that, especially in poorer families, higher incomes haven’t necessarily meant more accumulated wealth. Only half of Americans are wealthier than their parents were at their age (wealth = assets – debt). And as for the American promise of social and economic mobility — among people raised in the bottom fifth of the income ladder, 43 percent remain stuck there, and only 4 percent ever make it to the top.

Another new study looks at the opportunities afforded to today’s children, providing a glimpse of what the future might hold. Its author, Harvard professor Robert Putnam, warns of an “impending cliff in social mobility.”

Putnam believes that mobility is about to plummet due to collapsing family, community and social support systems. He quotes something that Laura Bush once said to him, “If you don’t know how long you’re going to keep your house or your job, you have less energy to invest in your kids.”

The New York TimesDavid Brooks writes:

“Putnam’s data verifies what many of us have seen anecdotally, that the children of the more affluent and less affluent are raised in starkly different ways and have different opportunities…. Equal opportunity, once core to the nation’s identity, is now a tertiary concern.”

Putnam’s work is ongoing but he presented some of his findings last month at the Aspen Ideas Festival. “The lines of difference are becoming more and more about class and less and less about race,” he told the crowd. By reframing the discussion as one of class and mobility instead of race and poverty, he hopes to help move the next generation out of the bottom and up the ladder.

  • submit to reddit

BillMoyers.com encourages conversation and debate around issues, events and ideas related to content on Moyers & Company and the BillMoyers.com website.

  • The editorial staff reserves the right to take down comments it deems inappropriate.
  • Profanity, personal attacks, hate speech, off-topic posts, advertisements and spam will not be tolerated.
  • Do not intentionally make false or misleading statements, impersonate someone else, break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity.

If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.

We need your help with this. If you feel a post is not in line with the comment policy, please flag it so that we can take a look. Comments and questions about our policy are welcome. Please send an email to feedback@billmoyers.com

Find out more about BillMoyers.com's privacy policy and terms of service.

  • http://www.facebook.com/derek.scarlino Derek Scarlino

    My parents didn’t have to go to South Korea to find work.

  • castello

    trickle down?

  • Anonymous

    The Republicans have been saying that it is the wealthy who create jobs, and that is why
    they love tax cuts to the wealthy.

    They seem to forget that the tax cuts given during the Bush era, are still in place…then, the unemployement problem is, in fact, because the wealthy have not been creating jobs.
    I have asked these two questions over and over.  Never once have I had a response.  Republicans seem to want the question to go away.   But, isn’t the truth two question are all that are the most relevant about the campaign are:”The wealthy have had their tax break since Bush, so where are the jobs they should have created?”Since you, Republicans, believe it is the wealthy who create jobs and they haven’t,  why do you blame President Obama for the unemployment rate?”

  • Marimic

    Up the ladder to what, exactly?…i just have one thing to say – economy needs ecology, but ecology could do without economy. It’s akin to the Native proverb (and I’m paraphrasing here) ‘after the last tree has been cut, after the last fish has been fished, only then will white man realize that money can’t be eaten’.  Social and economic justice goes hand in hand with environmental justice.  When society begins to really understand this, then perhaps we can see a more just, equitable society and the closing of the classes.