Group Think: The opposite of traditional ''groupthink,'' our Group Think poses one question to a variety of smart thinkers for insightful perspectives on relevant issues.

Breaking the Partisan Gridlock

Photo Credit: Dale Robbins

President Obama’s victory, as well as the victory of Democratic candidates in key Senate races, foretells sharper — not softer — lines in the next Congress. But this time, the trend may actually be driven by the election of reform-minded progressives rather than of more and more conservative Republicans.

Over the last generation, a leading storyline of American politics has been “asymmetric polarization” — with Democrats moving modestly left while Republicans gallop right. No one doubts that if Romney had won, however slim his margins, House Republicans would have aggressively pushed through additional tax cuts for the well-off and draconian spending cuts.

In the next Congress, however, conservative House Republicans will have a weaker hand. They face a president freed from the need to seek reelection and a Senate majority less, not more, willing to accede to the GOP’s demand of tax cuts for the rich and spending cuts for the rest. And pure gridlock would produce an outcome — full expiration of the Bush tax cuts — that Tea Party Republicans would hate. Whatever the deal reached, it will be more favorable to the middle class than the one that looked likely back in 2011.

Still, a budget compromise that will still involve lots of spending cuts will not resolve the deeper problems in our economy, including the hyper-concentration of income and wealth at the top, or the deeper problems in a political system still tilted heavily towards the main beneficiaries of that hyper-concentration. This will require a long-term program of political and economic reform, one that overcomes not just House GOP resistance, but also the blocking power of the Senate filibuster.

That’s another reason to welcome the election of Senators, like Connecticut Democrat Chris Murphy and Maine Independent Angus King, who’ve embraced the cause of reforming Senate procedures. A little more symmetry in polarization may be just what’s needed to start the long and difficult process of reform.


Jacob S. Hacker has devoted his career to researching and evaluating economic inequality, healthcare and social policy. Paul Pierson is an expert in American politics and public policy, comparative political economy and social theory. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class, written with Paul Pierson, professor of political science at the University of California at Berkeley. In the inaugural episode of Moyers & Company, Hacker and Pierson discussed their book with Bill.

BillMoyers.com encourages conversation and debate around issues, events and ideas related to content on Moyers & Company and the BillMoyers.com website.

  • The editorial staff reserves the right to take down comments it deems inappropriate.
  • Profanity, personal attacks, hate speech, off-topic posts, advertisements and spam will not be tolerated.
  • Do not intentionally make false or misleading statements, impersonate someone else, break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity.

If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.

We need your help with this. If you feel a post is not in line with the comment policy, please flag it so that we can take a look. Comments and questions about our policy are welcome. Please send an email to feedback@billmoyers.com

Find out more about BillMoyers.com's privacy policy and terms of service.

  • http://www.thealders.net/blogs Doug Alder

    Given that (from the NYT)

    After his speech, Mr. Obama tried to call both Mr. Boehner and the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, but was told they were asleep.

    I wouldn’t hold out any hope for real bipartisanship. Those were deliberate snubs and disrespect for the office of the president. No one refuses to take a call from POTUS – you get up, rub the sleep from your eyes , take the phone and say Mr. President, how can I help you.

  • Gene Clifford

    How
    about this as a first step toward a better working relationship in
    Congress: Instead of representatives and senators signing “Grover
    Norquist pledges” to never, ever support a tax increase no matter what,
    have someone prominent (perhaps someone like Bill Moyers) start a
    movement to have representatives and senators sign a pledge to vote for
    proposals which benefit the United States of America, whether or not
    their party and/or lobbyists support the proposal. In other words, a
    pledge to actually use their brains and judgment in considering where
    they stand on proposed legislation before voting. I know, I
    know….it’s a radical proposal but just maybe it would work.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jay-Kallio/693365586 Jay Kallio

    What nonsense that “Democrats move[ing] modestly left while Republicans gallop right”. Democrats moved right of center while Republicans moved far right. Richard Nixon was a left wing Liberal by today’s standards. Mislabeling today’s Democratic Party as leaning Left inappropriately redefines compromise on issues in favor of rightwing positions, not reasonable solutions to our problems, which remain intransigent because rightwing policies make problems worse, not better.

    If you favor pragmatic approaches, let’s support real change and solutions, like single payer/Medicare for All, which will realistically address our economic problems to a great degree. We don’t have an “entitlement” problem, we have a health care costs problem, and right wing, market driven solutions only make it worse.

  • Kay Finley

    I agree with your comments and am concerned that even my friends who are college educated are not reading books like yours or listening to Bill Moyers interviews. Our local Occupy group is discussing how we can get more informed citizens in this very red state of Idaho. It is discouraging when 70% of the people here listen to Fox News 24 hours a day. It is going to take a major and long-lasting effort to wake people up if we are to build a stable economy built around the efforts of Main Street, rather than corporate welfare.

  • kiki

    how interesting that you folks made no mention of the two most courageous women to be elected to the Senate – Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin. Cat got your tongues”? Truth be told they are two of the very few I trust in that esteemed house of Congress. As a an elderly woman, I know they have my back. Wish I could say the same for the rest of the so-called democrats who seem so ready to give away my social security and medicare- paid for by me- benefits. The fiscal cliff is an illusion created by the lobbyists and right wingers in Congress. At a time of deep unemployment and people living hand to mouth, the 99% is ready to revolt if this new group of folks and the president don’t represent what we voted for!~

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=664746728 Winter Green

    Returning in 2008 after 20+ years overseas it was clear to me that the GOP (at all levels) could instanteously give the same message over and over again, often based on hyperbole, misinformation, fear mongering, word shifting while the Dems/Progressive seemed only able to refute weakly. The Republican Party used to be ‘liberals’ and Dems the party of old white male bigots.

    In the 1980s the world change. Under Reagan, Thatcher and 11 other countries, there was The Great Global Restructuring: reduce government down to a postage stamp, privatize, put jobs in direct competition with profits to shareholders, merge into Global Giant Corporations and deregulate every Industry Sector on a global level. In other words, society or the environment no longer existed.

    Even today the New GOP talks about creating an economy with higher wages, lower educational costs and more benefits. That cannot happen under the Free Market that is only interested in low wages, no regulations, no environmental rules, no taxes, no commitment to any place or country and charging what the market can bear. Nothing has changed.

    What has to change is the whole system.