Paul Ryan’s Faux Populism Isn’t Going to End Poverty or Reduce Inequality

  • submit to reddit
Paul Ryan, Chris Van Hollen, Tom Price, House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., center, presides over a markup session where House Republicans are crafting a budget-balancing plan that sharply cuts spending on transportation, health care programs for the middle class and the poor, food stamps and other domestic initiatives, Wednesday, April 2, 2014, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Ryan is flanked by Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., right, the committee's ranking member, and Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., left. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) center, presides over a markup session where House Republicans are crafting a budget-balancing plan that sharply cuts spending on food stamps and other domestic initiatives on April 2, 2014 in Washington, DC. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

This post originally appeared at The Nation.

Paul Ryan’s fellow Republicans are quick to dismiss Elizabeth Warren as too radical, too progressive, too populist.

Mitt Romney’s running mate is abandoning Romneyism for populism — or what former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich has referred to as “Paul Ryan’s Faux Populism.”

But Ryan is trying — a bit clumsily, but trying all the same — to borrow a page from the Massachusetts senator as he seeks to remake himself in anticipation of a potential 2016 run for the Republican presidential nomination. He’s talking about poverty, about inequality, about shifting the focus away from meeting the demands of corporations and toward meeting the needs of Americans.

Mitt Romney’s running mate is abandoning Romneyism for populism — or what former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich has referred to as “Paul Ryan’s Faux Populism.”

Instead of repeating the Mittnomers of 2012 — “Corporations are people, my friend” — Ryan is suddenly informing fellow conservatives, “There’s another fallacy popular among our ranks. Just as some think anything government does is wrong, others think anything business does is right. But in fact they’re two sides of the same coin. Both big government and big business like to stack the deck in their favor. And though they are sometimes adversaries, they are far too often allies.”

It is hard to argue with Ryan’s reasoning. Populists and progressives have warned for more than a century that corporations are “boldly marching, not for economic conquests only, but for political power.” The author of those words, former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Edward Ryan, asked in 1873: “Which shall rule — wealth or man; which shall lead — money or intellect; who shall fill public stations — educated and patriotic free men, or the feudal serfs of corporate capital?” Elizabeth Warren confirmed Ryan’s worst fears when she addressed Netroots Nation last week and declared, “The game is rigged and the rich and the powerful have lobbyists and lawyers and plenty of friends in Congress. Everybody else, not so much.”

And now, Paul Ryan is on-message, announcing as only a career politician can, that “our country has had enough of politics.” He’s proposing to “reconceive the federal government’s role in the fight against poverty.” And he is even ripping corporations, decrying the way in which big government has become “a willing accomplice” of big business.

Ryan explained last week at Hillsdale College’s Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship session that “crony capitalism isn’t a side effect; it’s a direct result of big government.”

Don’t look for Paul Ryan on the front lines of actual fights to reduce inequality or address injustice.

Grab the pitchforks!

But don’t look for Paul Ryan on the front lines of actual fights to reduce inequality or address injustice.

The House Budget Committee chairman, who on Thursday released an “anti-poverty proposal” that rehashed decades-old schemes to scale back anti-poverty initiatives and regulatory protections for low-income Americans, offers scant evidence of a serious determination to solve the problems that have got Americans up in arms. If Ryan was serious, he wouldn’t be proposing, as his “Opportunity Grant” plan does, to “consolidate” existing federal programs to aid the poor into block grants to the states — an approach that would allow Republican governors who have already shown a penchant for undermining healthcare, food-stamp and education initiatives the “flexibility” to do even more harm.

Congressman Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat who serves with Ryan on the Budget Committee, nails it when he warns about a proposal that “uses the sunny language of ‘reform’ as a guise to cut vital safety-net programs.”

Marian Wright Edelman was even blunter.

“House Budget Chair Paul Ryan’s draft is a small, mean and worn idea that picks on poor children and families while not asking for one cent of sacrifice from rich corporations and rich individuals. His proposal would dismantle the safety net that is working,” said the president of the Children’s Defense Fund, who ticked off federal programs that would be threatened by Ryan’s scheme. “Head Start works, it gets poor children ready for school. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) works, it keeps the wolves of hunger at bay. Title I works, the funds are going to help our most disadvantaged schools and students, but the funds need to be increased and accountability tightened. I look forward to the next draft from Chairman Ryan that is fair to poor children and families and asks the rich corporations and individuals to pay their fair share.”

Edelman could end up waiting for a long time, as the congressman has not coupled his momentarily populist rhetoric with anything akin to a call for corporate responsibility or fair taxation.

So if Ryan is not really worried about holding corporations to account, and if he is not evidencing a serious intent address the problem of inequality, what is on his mind?

Last week’s populist speech at the Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship and this week’s poverty speech at the American Enterprise Institute begin the roll-out of Paul Ryan Version 2.0.

The answer, of course, is that Ryan is worried about addressing his own problem: an association in the public’s mind with the failed messages of the 2012 Romney-Ryan campaign.

Last week’s populist speech at the Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship and this week’s poverty speech at the American Enterprise Institute begin the roll-out of Paul Ryan Version 2.0. Next comes the August publication of Ryan’s 2016 campaign book, The Way Forward: Renewing the American Idea, complete with its epic cover shot of Americans reaching out to touch a triumphal Ryan. Then there’s the bus tour.

Yes, the bus tour.

So Ryan is campaigning. To the extent that it is possible he will do so in populist style and with populist rhetoric about crony capitalism and fighting poverty.

But don’t be confused.

This is still the same Paul Ryan who went to the floor of the House in 2008 and rallied Republicans to support the Wall Street bailout. This is still the same Paul Ryan who opposed regulation of the big banks. This is still the same Paul Ryan who supported and continues to support) the free trade deals demanded by multinational corporations. This is still the same Paul Ryan who has peddled Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare “reforms” that would turn sound programs into vehicles for steering federal funds into the accounts of Wall Street speculators and health-insurance corporations.

This is still the same Paul Ryan who during the current election cycle has padded his campaign committee and “leadership PAC” accounts with almost $9 million in donations — with Wall Street securities and investment interests and the health-insurance industry giving most generously. And this is the same Paul Ryan who, when Congress took its August break in 2013 jetted home to Wisconsin via Arizona — where he was a featured speaker at the annual retreat for billionaire donors organized by the Koch brothers.

The other featured speaker was then – House majority leader Eric Cantor, for whom the ensuing months did not go well. Cantor’s Republican primary defeat — at the hands of a critic of “crony capitalism” — provided an indication that the American people are increasingly agitated. And increasingly disinclined toward the sort of insider politics practiced by career politicians such as Ryan.

Ryan got the signal.

He is rebranding himself.

He has downloaded some populist rhetoric to go with his “kinder, gentler” talk about poverty.

But Paul Ryan’s populism is not the real thing. It’s the Koch-tested, Koch-approved version.

The views expressed in this post are the author’s alone, and presented here to offer a variety of perspectives to our readers.

John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His most recent book is The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition. A co-founder of the media reform organization Free Press, Nichols is co-author with Robert W. McChesney of The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again and Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy. Follow him on Twitter at @NicholsUprising.
  • submit to reddit
  • Skeletonman

    He’s Billy Mays, talking up the Sham Wow! again.

  • Katherine Farmer

    Wait till they realize what happens when too many are starving. I don’t know, can you figure how it will be? Look at what is going on in countries with too many starving people.

  • Keith

    He is no populist, he is a Scoundrel and a Thief.

  • Anonymous

    Is anyone falling for this bull?

  • http://www.rockinhits.com/ JJ

    Paul Ryan, The man that came up with a “budget”, that spends more money than the Federal Government takes in. ( Don’t try that at home )

  • GregoryC

    The paragraph listing the pro-corporate giveaways that Rep. Ryan supports can also be applied to the Clintons and the current President Obama. Obama has worked in secrecy, classifying draft texts to keep Americans ignorant, to pass the biggest corporate giveaways in US history: TPP, TTIP, TiSA. Obama wrote the biggest check in US history bailing out Wall Street leaving homeowners to face foreclosure. An article at Salon talked about how Obama had the Congressional votes to raise minimum wage in 2009, but chose not to do so. It is Obama who hired lobbyists and Wall Street insiders to run his administration (the evil republicans didn’t force him to do that).

    I’ll never forget the video of former president Bill Clinton and Rep. Paul Ryan talking about “entitlement reform” backstage at a Pete Peterson foundation event.

  • Anonymous

    Maria . you think Leonard `s storry is inconceivable,
    last thursday I bought a great Alfa Romeo from having made $4878 this last five
    weeks and-even more than, 10-k this past-munth . this is certainly the coolest
    job I have ever had . I began this 9-months ago and almost immediately began to
    make more than $75 per-hour . This Site J­a­m­2­0­.­C­O­M­

  • Anonymous

    My Uncle Matthew recently got a new cream
    Ford Shelby GT500 Coupe by working part-time off of a laptop… visit this
    website J­a­m­2­0­.­C­O­M­