House Republicans Demand Cuts for Wall Street Watchdogs in Budget Deal

  • submit to reddit

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio leaves a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 12, 2013, where he vehemently rebuked conservative groups who oppose the pending bipartisan budget compromise struck by House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Senate Budget Committee Chair Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

On Monday evening, in an attempt to avoid another government shutdown, House and Senate negotiators released a draft of a budget deal — the first detailed spending agreement since 2011.

But less than two weeks after outgoing Fed Chair Ben Bernanke said that “excessively tight” budgets were “counterproductive,” and had made the recovery “weaker than it otherwise would be,” the draft announced Monday maintains many of the cuts from the disastrous sequester deal.

The Guardian’s Dan Roberts reports that Republicans had backed off of their previous demand for deeper cuts to the food stamp program, settling instead for partially defunding Wall Street regulators.

Roberts writes:

Hal Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House appropriations committee, singled out the budget for the Securities and Exchange Commission in a press release, which received $324m less than it requested and $25m taken from reserves he called “a slush fund”.

Wall Street lobbyists have been pressing Congress to curb the growing power of regulators like the SEC in the wake of the financial crisis and Rogers said the spending bill had also [designated] $44m to an economic review of its rule-making process.

This decision, and similar cuts to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, brought an angry response from Wall Street campaigners.

“It is shameful that Wall Street’s allies in Congress have again failed to fund the very agencies that are charged with protecting Main Street and preventing another financial crisis,” said Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO of Better Markets, an independent nonprofit organisation that promotes the public interest in the financial markets.

“The only reason not to fully fund the CFTC and the SEC is to protect Wall Street profits, bonuses and reckless trading. This rewards Wall Street’s lobbyists and campaign cash while endangering American families,” he added.

And while polls show that Americans think public spending has increased dramatically, Politico reports that non-military discretionary spending is still down significantly since Obama entered the White House:

What’s most telling is to compare the numbers now with spending levels six years ago for fiscal 2008 — the last full budget cycle under Obama’s predecessor, President George W. Bush.

Total discretionary spending for 2008 was $1.176 trillion, more than half of which, or $642.1 billion, was designated for the Pentagon and military operations — in Iraq then as well as Afghanistan.

That left $534.4 billion among the 11 other appropriations bills, almost exactly what will be the case now in the 2014 omnibus. The big difference is inflation. And when the Bush dollars are adjusted upward to reflect changes in the cost of living since 2008, it shows that Obama will be left with about 10 percent, or $53 billion, less than his predecessor.

But that comparison is incomplete; according to the Census Bureau, the US population has grown by over four percent over that same period.

Finally, Sam Stein reports for the Huffington Post that the scientific community “isn’t happy” about the deal, which restores a fraction of the sequester’s  budget cuts for research. Stein writes:

…The NIH budget target falls short of what both the White House and Senate Democrats wanted. House Democrats said it was $714 million less than “the 2013 enacted level” of $30.648 billion. According to the NIH’s own numbers, meanwhile, it is approximately $950 million less than its 2012 level. In fact, the number is lower than during President Barack Obama’s first year in office and, when adjusted for inflation, is lower than it was in every year but the first of the George W. Bush administration.

“The FY14 omnibus spending bill falls short of restoring funding for lifesaving National Institutes of Health (NIH) biomedical research,” said Carrie Wolinetz, president of United for Medical Research, a coalition of leading research and medical institutions. “The proposed package won’t adequately reverse the damage done by last year’s budget sequester and ensure the nation’s biomedical research enterprise makes continued progress in lifesaving research and development.”

The sequester resulted from a 2011 standoff between the White House and House Republicans who were threatening to not raise the government’s debt limit. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the cuts shaved 0.6 percent off of last year’s economic growth, and cost the economy 750,000 jobs.

  • submit to reddit

BillMoyers.com encourages conversation and debate around issues, events and ideas related to content on Moyers & Company and the BillMoyers.com website.

  • The editorial staff reserves the right to take down comments it deems inappropriate.
  • Profanity, personal attacks, hate speech, off-topic posts, advertisements and spam will not be tolerated.
  • Do not intentionally make false or misleading statements, impersonate someone else, break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity.

If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.

We need your help with this. If you feel a post is not in line with the comment policy, please flag it so that we can take a look. Comments and questions about our policy are welcome. Please send an email to info@moyersmedia.com

Find out more about BillMoyers.com's privacy policy and terms of service.

  • Anonymous

    Protecting their money trough and their kinfolk. When will the American people wake up?

  • Anonymous

    I hope all those clowns are thrown off the stage.

  • Diana Reichardt

    Everything you have!

  • Anonymous

    Cutting the SEC budget is transparently wrongheaded. (I could have said arguably criminal.) Did anybody mention that the SEC’s budget (projected at around $1.6 Bn for FY 2014) is almost always entirely offset by user fees charged various registrants and licensed parties. Though it has its problems (i.e., the revolving door with Wall Street), it remains one of the finest agencies in Washington, and its continued effectiveness is essential to the health of our economy. Any Senator or Member of Congress voting to reduce SEC funding should be investigated, along with their Wall Street contributors.

  • Jerry Squarey

    Closing the Carried Interest Loophole would fund the SEC.